X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from fmailhost03.isp.att.net ([207.115.11.53] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2c4) with ESMTP id 2691314 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:17:44 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.115.11.53; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net Received: from [70.149.3.214] (adsl-149-3-214.mia.bellsouth.net[70.149.3.214]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc03) with SMTP id <20080124111704H0300i8kqte>; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:17:04 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [70.149.3.214] Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v753) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <41B75173-2799-4C1F-A300-711718B2B949@bellsouth.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bulent Aliev Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: [FlyRotary]To turbo or not to turbo Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:17:03 -0500 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.753) Greg, I would not even think about it. Have you ever lifted a Twin Sequential turbo?(assuming that's what you are talking about) Also they have a different mission. You do not need it in an aircraft. Just go with a properly sized single turbo. Buly On Jan 24, 2008, at 12:56 AM, Greg Ward wrote: > Has anyone tried the dual turbo installation in their AC Do they > hold up? I know they were using them in some racing applications, > and I am trying (again) to determine which is the best way to go > here..... > Greg Ward > sorting out the pieces