X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from el-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.162.178] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) with ESMTP id 2282604 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:31:08 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.162.178; envelope-from=rwstracy@gmail.com Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id r23so185321elf for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:30:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=en4iiEhVzwQnEbmHEIA7CTmToaUAdvgtxKnmoHqQmlWLB6quigt2SYJGlL9y5+mxsh/157wZzXhL023NuLmoCgQKbnB5cfRwD2dDXulnLhLevUhcohPhiPippifKO92Ku8zHsJPBoUZTvgsEKVgZrQEKlsN12gtNjYDPfc7TS3Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=URvhwQasuAVeS9rIcAC+y9DanjMiSTCb5ffITejub6JqMebD07Ebmb0u7VfKn3UmVLyGI12NSsdQNWsms2AapgWAGaW/jJc01dk/LoY8fQ7o2f9sk+eoaDJyQQeicvYx3r1f/fWwMwqhm5ja5zTikk37uVWPRjtA/IzcV5rK+MQ= Received: by 10.143.33.19 with SMTP id l19mr364170wfj.1187973030745; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.115.16 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 09:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b4b137c0708240930n11cbcf79qe30468f4c77991b1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:30:30 -0400 From: "Tracy Crook" Sender: rwstracy@gmail.com To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Carb In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_85341_2095269.1187973030679" References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 75e69d136bbe72bf ------=_Part_85341_2095269.1187973030679 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I think this is the spec on ventury vacuum (V V) at max specified CFM. Performance carbs (generally 4 barrels) are designed with about 1/2 the ventury drop as "grocery getter" carb designs. The less the V V, the better WOT performance (more MAP) but the harder it is to design due to the smaller signal. 10" H2O is a pretty small signal for MAX CFM. BTW, This is unrelated to throat size. Tracy Crook On 8/23/07, George Lendich wrote: > > Ed, Lynn, Bill or anyone. > I'm trying to figure out how to extrapolate various air flow figures which > have different vacuum testing parameters such as those with 10" of water > verses those with 12" of water and 20.4" of water. I don't know where the > 20.4" of water comes from, but apparently it does exist. > I assume there is some calculation which can be applied? > I'm only concerned with extrapolating from one ( known value like 10") to > another ( like 12") - for comparison purposes. > George ( down under) > ------=_Part_85341_2095269.1187973030679 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
I think this is the spec on ventury vacuum (V V) at max specified CFM.  Performance carbs (generally 4 barrels) are designed with about 1/2 the ventury drop as "grocery getter" carb designs.  The less the V V, the better WOT performance (more MAP) but the harder it is to design due to the smaller signal.  10" H2O is a pretty small signal for MAX CFM.
 
BTW, This is unrelated to throat size.
 
Tracy Crook

 
On 8/23/07, George Lendich <lendich@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
Ed, Lynn, Bill or anyone.
I'm trying to figure out how to extrapolate various air flow figures which have different vacuum testing parameters such as those with 10" of water verses those with 12" of water and 20.4" of water. I don't know where the 20.4" of water comes from, but apparently it does exist.
I assume there is some calculation which can be applied?
I'm only concerned with extrapolating from one ( known value like 10") to another ( like 12") - for comparison purposes.
George ( down under)

------=_Part_85341_2095269.1187973030679--