X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) with ESMTP id 2277965 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:44:40 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.148; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com ([64.102.121.159]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 22 Aug 2007 08:44:02 -0400 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.19,294,1183348800"; d="scan'208"; a="68694729:sNHT47522972" Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com (rtp-core-1.cisco.com [64.102.124.12]) by rtp-dkim-2.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l7MCi2HX017185 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:44:02 -0400 Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l7MCi1xs018783 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:44:02 GMT Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:44:01 -0400 Received: from [64.102.38.199] ([64.102.38.199]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:44:01 -0400 Message-ID: <46CC2F92.3070800@nc.rr.com> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:44:02 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Tap 'em holes was [FlyRotary] Throttle Body Nut Ideas References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Aug 2007 12:44:01.0598 (UTC) FILETIME=[1DA87DE0:01C7E4BA] Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-2; header.From=echristley@nc.rr.com; dkim=neutral Ed Anderson wrote: > Scott, I think the best answer is to simply tap those bolt holes for > the thread size of your bolts. This does a number of things. > > 1. There is nothing to fall off inside the plenum, no nuts, no bolts > or no nut plates > 2. Its a few fractions of an ounce lighter > 3. You never have to worry about getting onto the back side of the > plate (looks like you intend to weld it to the plenum tube. > 4. Two of your nuts are pretty close to the wall of your plenum if > that bright circle is indeed where it will be placed - can't tell for > sure but could be interference with the wall of plenum. > 5. You never have to worry about it again. > > Ed > > I've been told by a machinist that tapped holes in aluminum are weak. Any truth to that?