|
|
<... we have the evidence flying so what more can I say. Even
if its not 0.135 HP its clear that real world data regarding EWP
on the flying rotary has clearly shown it is entirely
feasible...>
You couldn't be more right. When the smoke clears and the dust
settles, we're going to be a DAMN SITE closer to 0.135 hp than
13.5. All accumulated data will demonstrate that PL is off by a
couple orders of magnitude.
No surprises there .... Jim S.
Marvin Kaye wrote:
I mean
we have the evidence flying so what more can I say. Even if
its not 0.135 HP
its clear that real world data regarding EWP on the flying
rotary has clearly
shown it is entirely feasible and does not need to draw
several hundred amps
as Paul's calculations indicated. Your figures are no
better than the
accuracy of your assumptions (trust me - I know {:>)
Best Regards
Ed Anderson
RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
eanderson@carolina.rr.com
>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
>> Archive:
http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|
|