X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com ([66.249.90.177] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2019865 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 01 May 2007 13:58:45 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.249.90.177; envelope-from=blake.lewis@gmail.com Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id b35so418929ika for ; Tue, 01 May 2007 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iagRFnSxymZaKDqbuONZ/TEeKS0Y36R/ip0MGK7WY5AebiOzBeFHKWJJ/uA9b4iuYKej9oEafgs5sGVA6jz7URsZpGSyA+AAjpnUp07p/agSNHoc7wc5spcx7ZC+E3l1dFKWbDo3at0R3xvrr9wRyEglaZPxU7G7nesH+ZB/rIU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qfT6U5WNTR9ikLluP6ccurC7/lWpnTOnhlNEpQPH9G6GITs6drFLl+AgT6pe0otCBwlocgnM65MmEIWKAj79by4VoT31HYtx+JD7c61ziPG29Xg7t0MN/DoYU7S+3BLxrgMn4bNvjtROPQFZGuJALfuzm3mGxCugo5pnUWVHAvs= Received: by 10.82.189.6 with SMTP id m6mr14569425buf.1178042267118; Tue, 01 May 2007 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.118.1 with HTTP; Tue, 1 May 2007 10:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 12:57:47 -0500 From: "Blake Lewis" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Throttle body size/ other "Paul" issues In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Tracy, In his original message he said " I'm not a fan of this (Tracy's) solution". I guess he went looking for other solutions.... Blake On 5/1/07, Tracy Crook wrote: > > Different subject: > > I'm getting relayed messages from Paul's site giving "fixes" for the > injector 'sneak' path that powers the EC2 when power is applied to the > injectors. I don't know who raised the question but To whom it may concern, > the suggested "fix" is completely wrong. Unless you wire the injectors > directly to the battery with no switch of any kind (the instructions > explicitly forbid this) there is nothing to be fixed. > > Not that this advice is needed on this list, but wouldn't it make sense to > ask the guy that designed the thing? > > Tracy