X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 50 [XX] Return-Path: Received: from alnrmhc16.comcast.net ([204.127.225.96] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.8) with ESMTP id 2018284 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:55:52 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.225.96; envelope-from=rlwhite@comcast.net Received: from rlwhite-desktop (c-68-35-160-229.hsd1.nm.comcast.net[68.35.160.229]) by comcast.net (alnrmhc16) with SMTP id <20070430215450b1600hnlnle>; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:55:01 +0000 Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:55:06 -0600 From: Bob White To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] trimmed prop Message-Id: <20070430155506.8cb8e479.rlwhite@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.0 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ouch! Steve, If It's any consolation (and I know it's not), I shortened my prop a lot more than that and wish that's all I had done. :) Sorry to see the mishap though. Bob W. On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:01:55 -0600 "sboese" wrote: > On Wednesday of last week I made my first XC flight with my 13B powered > RV6A. The flight was from Laramie, WY, to Benson, MN, with a distance > covered of 507 nm. It took 4hr 15 min non stop using 30.4 gal of fuel > leaving 7.6 gal reserve. We started at an initial gross wt of 1796 lb and > cg of 73.2 in. That was my first excursion to density altitudes less than > 7000 ft. It was really fun to see climb rates over 1000 fpm with 1700 lb > gross wt at 3200 ft density altitude and to feel the increased acceleration > on take off. Static rpm at 3200 ft density altitude was 4870 with 27 in MAP > and showing 11.1 gal/hr fuel consumption rate. That makes me think I could > use a prop with less pitch. My extrapolation of the mixture table for the > EC2 with the snubbers installed worked very well with the higher manifold > pressures that had not been tried previously with my setup. That was good > news. > > The bad news is what happens when I forget to remove the tow bar and feed it > to the propeller (see attached photo). No injuries or other damage occurred > as far as has been determined at this point. The 12 hour drive back home > yesterday gave me plenty of time to reflect on my stupidity. I concluded > that my "experiment" was probably not the best way to investigate the effect > of a smaller prop. Needless to say, if someone has upgraded to the 2.85 > drive and has a prop for a 2.17 drive for sale, I would be interested to > know about that. > > Sheepishly, > > Steve Boese > -- N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 - http://www.bob-white.com 3.8 Hours Total Time and holding Cables for your rotary installation - http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/