X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.63] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTP id 1931697 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:06:16 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.63; envelope-from=Dastaten@earthlink.net Received: from [69.91.63.162] (helo=[192.168.0.3]) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1HTWXI-0004Qu-LV for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:05:28 -0400 Message-ID: <45FF6B44.7060906@earthlink.net> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:04:04 -0500 From: David Staten User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Speaking of Mistral....? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 9a30bff84e6cb88f95c85d38d22416599ef193a6bfc3dd48ab5fb412ce7ae70779ef3e3a95cbc01885e0aeacdf564a64350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 69.91.63.162 Bill. I understand what you are saying here. Unfortunately I dont think you are visualizing our setup as it actually is. The mistral-provided fuel rail has the pinhole MACHINED into the far end of the rail. There is no way for the pinhole to bypass a regulator attached to the far end of the fuel rail, as the pinhole comes first (beyond the injectors, but before the threads) I understand the reasons why to have a pinhole to bypass the regulator. The only way we can install a regulator downstream of the fuel rail would be to drill/ream the pinhole, then put T's with another pinhole between the rail and regulator. Chris doesn't like the idea of drilling/reaming the pinhole out. I'm indifferent (as in, any workable solution is fine with me). Dave wrjjrs@aol.com wrote: > Dave, Bob, ET all, > The normal position for the fuel regulator is after the fuel rail. You > will need a return line to the tank. The small orifice is used ONLY to > allow a re-prime and bypasses the regulator. There is almost no change > in fuel pressure with that tiny hole. I appologise if everyone knows > this already. It needs to be said though that the reason for the > orifice has nothing to do with the fuel pressure, it is simply a > device to prevent vapor lock if you run a tank dry. I think it's a > good idea. > Bill Jepson > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dastaten@earthlink.net > To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net > Sent: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 8:59 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Speaking of Mistral....? > > Bob White wrote: > > >Hi Chris, > > > > > >Did Mistral provide the pump and/or regulator? > > > >Bob W. > > > > > Mistral did not provide the pump or regulator. What was purchased and > provided was an intake with runners, integral throttle body, fuel rail > with injector bosses and heat shielding that is integral to the fuel > rail and mounting. > > I know what Chris was trying to say, because he and I have discussed > this at length, and while its a little difficult to visualize from > text only, its an accurate representation of what has transpired, with > all the engineering input (reserved input, I might add ) > > What I have NOW recommended to Chris is that we have a T UPSTREAM of > the fuel rail, with the regulator now on the side/rise of the T, and > the fuel rail on the distal run of the T, feeding the rail, the > pinhole and the fuel return circuit. This will effectively cause the > fuel pressure at all points downstream of the T/Regulator assembly to > be at the set regulated pressure (this is a manifold referenced fuel > pressure regulator). > > The regulator would have a return from it going to the return circuit > as well. Check valves on both return circuits. > > I've made it explicitly clear to Chris that we do in fact need a > regulated fuel supply for our fuel injection to work properly/best. > The pinhole by itself does not serve this purpose adequately, becase > the fixed pinhole cannot modulate its size to maintain a constant > pressure at all throttle and fuel flows. > > Our set up: Mistral Intake/Fuel rail. Dual Electric fuel pumps, > EC2/EM2. Turbo capable. > Dave > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free > from AOL at *AOL.com* > .