X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 30 [X] Return-Path: Received: from web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.199.105] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with SMTP id 1918804 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 11:47:08 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.199.105; envelope-from=mike.lafleur@sbcglobal.net Received: (qmail 74424 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Mar 2007 15:46:20 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=f3LcszpjvLO8ftexQadj9k9f4lWhbrjf6MkI2N+1BSibv76ixDjsihwdJ9EVcHS8gvIyHcWPvM51VIk+yDU5QKpk2FOLSaslDOUr+ZPGpXEplgnHQlcG31lQ4UMTFQ+VvsCmpMMp2FOJav88VamOwQ4aWqNqtitrxzvvj6XBaSc=; X-YMail-OSG: 5Xv4J18VM1k3Z9aYGLaq2z95mbMgqm5fMya4wu8HNqqNG9qOF2hujPexj_agdOl..VVYAWmH_AzZOveqQmqXN.8VPm0F1vtD9dzC2cqZBOsBqszGkKcwAWN87gUYjrJ2ZlKBGbIukzixpE0- Received: from [12.41.112.201] by web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:46:20 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/368.8 YahooMailWebService/0.6.132.8 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 08:46:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael LaFleur Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: A solution? Injector flow rate mystery solved To: Rotary motors in aircraft MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1571296173-1173800780=:72616" Message-ID: <733781.72616.qm@web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --0-1571296173-1173800780=:72616 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable The diode should have a clamp voltage of about 60 volts. This pulls the ene= rgy out of the coil as fast as possible without getting too expensive. (Hig= her than 60 volts means a more expensive manufacturing process)=0A=0AMike = LaFleur=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: Al Gietzen =0ATo: Rotary motors in aircraft =0ASent:= Monday, March 12, 2007 11:33:28 AM=0ASubject: [FlyRotary] Re: A solution? = Injector flow rate mystery solved=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0ASub= ject: [FlyRotary]=0ARe: A solution? was : The truth??? / Injector flow rate= mystery solved=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0A=0A=0AWhat about MOV's? Typical=0Atransi= ent response time measured in nanoseconds...=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A= =0AMy expert, who has designed ECUs for=0Aother applications, had the follo= wing comments that may be of interest:=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0AAs far as the ECU = goes, the diodes=0Ashould be replaced with =0A=0A=0Atranzorbs or zeners of = about 30=0Avolts. I don't think a pull down resistor =0A=0A=0Aof 1K as sug= gested will do=0Aanything at all. It should be roughly 8 times =0A=0A=0Ath= e injector resistance (assuming=0Athe injector hold current is less than 8 = =0A=0A=0Atimes the pull-in current -- typically=0Ait's between 4 and 6). A= nd if you =0A=0A=0Awant a true peak and hold injector=0Adriver, then the Na= tional LM1949 is the =0A=0A=0Away to go.=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0AThe resistor onl= y makes =0A=0A=0Asense at very high RPMs, probably=0Ahigher than what the e= ngine can do, so I =0A=0A=0Aconsider it optional. The=0Arelay contacts are= not the issue. The issue is =0A=0A=0Aprotecting the drive transistor=0Awh= ich will fail at voltages lower than what =0A=0A=0Awill cause an arc in the= relay=0A(not to mention RF noise). The other issue =0A=0A=0Ais minimizing= the current flow as=0Athe magnetic field collapses.=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0AAs p= reviously mentioned, the =91correct=92=0Away to drive a high flow rate inje= ctor is using a =0A=0A=0Apeak and hold circuit.=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0AFWIW;=0A= =0A=0A =0A=0A=0AAl G=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A --0-1571296173-1173800780=:72616 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The diode should have a clamp voltage of about 60 volts. This pulls = the energy out of the coil as fast as possible without getting too expensiv= e. (Higher than 60 volts  means a more expensive manufacturing process= )

Mike LaFleur

----- Original Message ----
From: A= l Gietzen <ALVentures@cox.net>
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <f= lyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 11:33:28 AM<= br>Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: A solution? Injector flow rate mystery solved<= br>
=0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0A =0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A
=0A= =0A

Subject:<= span style=3D"font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma;"> [FlyRotary]=0ARe: A s= olution? was : The truth??? / Injector flow rate mystery solved

=0A=0A

 

=0A=0A
=0A=0A

What about MOV's?  = Typical=0Atransient response time measured in nanoseconds...
=0A
=0A&= nbsp;  <Marv>  

=0A=0A

My expert, who has designed E= CUs for=0Aother applications, had the following comments that may be of int= erest:

=0A=0A

 

=0A=0A

As far as the ECU goes, the diodes=0Ashould be repla= ced with

=0A=0A

tranzorbs or zeners of about 30=0Avolts.  I don't think a pull d= own resistor

=0A=0A

of 1K as suggested will do=0Aanything at all.  It should be = roughly 8 times

=0A=0A

<= font face=3D"Verdana" size=3D"2">the injector resistance (assuming=0Athe injector hold current = is less than 8

=0A=0A

times the pull-in current -- typically=0Ait's between 4 and 6).=   And if you

=0A=0A

want a true peak and hold injector=0Adriver, then the Nation= al LM1949 is the

=0A=0A

way to go.

=0A=0A

=  

=0A=0A

The resistor only makes

=0A=0A

sense at very high RPMs, probably=0Ahigher than wh= at the engine can do, so I

=0A=0A

consider it optional.  The=0Arelay contacts ar= e not the issue.  The issue is

=0A=0A

protecting the drive transistor=0Awhich wi= ll fail at voltages lower than what

=0A=0A

will cause an arc in the relay=0A(not to m= ention RF noise).  The other issue

=0A=0A

is minimizing the current flow as=0Ath= e magnetic field collapses.

=0A=0A

 

=0A=0A

As previously mentioned, the =91correct=92=0Away= to drive a high flow rate injector is using a

=0A=0A

peak and hold circuit.

= =0A=0A

 

=0A=0A<= p class=3D"MsoNormal">FWIW;

=0A=0A

 

=0A=0A

Al G

=0A=0A
=0A=0A
 
=0A=0A

--0-1571296173-1173800780=:72616--