X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 30 [X] Return-Path: Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.7) with HTTP id 1917758 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:27:27 -0400 From: marv@lancair.net Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: A solution? was : The truth??? / Injector flow rate mystery solved To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.7 Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:27:27 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html;charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Hi Thomas,

Actually, in all the years since I started FlyRotary (as an early excommunicate of "that other list", to answer your question), there has been one instance where I found it necessary to terminate someone's subscription.  It didn't happen without his knowledge, however, as I gave him a chance to put things right. Rather than stepping up to the plate, admitting he was wrong and putting the situtaiton behind us, the offender's reply to me was a 3-word suggestion that I perform a biological impossibility upon myself.  He's no longer a member of the group.  If you're curious about the infraction, it was pretty simple... there was a difference of opinion and rather than discuss the matter reasonably this person sunk to personal insults and foul language directed at another FlyRotary subscriber.  All I asked for was an aopolgy to the person who was the target of his invectives.  He couldn't do that.  Since his removal we have never suffered a similar incident, so I think it was the right thing to do and I'd do it again if faced with a similar situation.

   <Marv>


 "Thomas Jakits" <rotary.thjakits@gmail.com>wrote:
"""
Marv,

Did that EVER happen for ANY reason? :)
____

> Unlike "that other list", there has never been a removal of anyone's
> subscription simply for speaking their mind, and as long as I'm in charge,
> there won't be.
>
<Marv>
"""