X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 10 [X] Return-Path: Received: from smtp104.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([68.142.229.101] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with SMTP id 1850898 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:57:14 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.229.101; envelope-from=downing.j@sbcglobal.net Received: (qmail 731 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2007 12:56:27 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE; b=0FcmTIugsU13ejYfUg16sIJw/A5f3MPh5rqz4zBXRbbLJJZC3gkKBuzmm1dn0bva/Eo1SoT2OKJygaoQaiuNAKU/2Q7Q1j80pCwRdp+1H5ljzRCqZOFFPerK+fZEMPlhuMhO31uLjNIns/Fmfgd++KWis4OJnSOYNVonxeFgF6M= ; Received: from unknown (HELO mom) (downing.j@sbcglobal.net@75.40.224.46 with login) by smtp104.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Feb 2007 12:56:27 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: EikvzKgVM1mcPEY45.DLPCX33rdNxgiLNn2rccP6.ruIizPOLxN1cIpbixi7ZZ8guRYtuNIbTvlfn5VVHATA89RI_GktWK5KR9KYODf5yWIzGnOo1LqQz07qRQ5Xbc5Ji9s.WbHMoD2aIFI- Message-ID: <001401c754ee$9272dfa0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> From: "John Downing" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Off Topic request - Re: [FlyRotary] ATC fuses with manual or auto-reset Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 07:56:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thomas, having spent four years in an electrical harness plant, unless you know someone in Mexico or Japan to do alittle midnight requisition, I don't believe you will find those switch's. JohnD ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas y Reina Jakits" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 9:26 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Off Topic request - Re: [FlyRotary] ATC fuses with manual or auto-reset > By the way, > > does anyone know a source for OEM-style switches? > I would like to get some extra equipment for my Toyota, but > a) OEM switches are outrageously expensive > b) Not in stock either... > > I know there are manufacturers that supply specifically that market, but for > some reason I am not capable to find any!! > > Thanx for your help, > > Thomas J. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Sargent" > To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 6:57 PM > Subject: [FlyRotary] ATC fuses with manual or auto-reset > > > > > > Waytek sells the ATC fuses below that have either a manual or auto-reset > > capability. > > > > This offers some options to those deciding between circuit breakers or > > fuses. > > > > Link to the Waytek PDF catalog page: > > > > http://order.waytekwire.com/IMAGES/M37/catalog/219_083.PDF > > > > > > 5-30 Amp, low-profile, manual reset (Type 1) > > > > 10-30 Amp, manual reset (Type 1) > > > > 10-30 Amp, auto-reset (Type 3) > > > > > > 5-30 Amp w push-to-trip test feature > > > > > > Regards, > > Chris Sargent > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]On > > Behalf Of Bulent Aliev > > Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 7:19 AM > > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: CBs and fuses > > > > In my plane for everything electrical I installed, I asked myself: > > can I fly without this item? And accordingly decided on CB or fuse. > > A CZ builder had followed the plans and had installed the electric > > nose gear fuse in the "per plans" location under the passenger seat. > > He takes a passenger for a flight, but on retraction, his nose wheel > > is cocked , hits the bottom of the fuselage and pops the fuse. > > Something goes wrong with the manual override too. Now he asks the > > passenger to unbuckle, turn around and put his butt against the > > windshield, so he can replace the fuse while flying the plane at the > > same time. If he had spent few dollars on a CB, he could have pushed > > it in and flown with the gear down. > > Buly > > On Feb 18, 2007, at 7:35 AM, Thomas y Reina Jakits wrote: > > > >> Hi Al, > >> > >> interesting!! > >> > >> Next chance I have I will try to find out more about this > >> (reasoning for use of fuses over CB's in this helicopter). > >> I don't really buy the "repair after trip" -reason as the result is > >> the same. > >> Whatever caused the fuse or CB to trip, it should be repaired. What > >> really happens is that the fuse is replaced - if it doesn't trip > >> immediately, no one will look any deeper into it, than a > >> "look" (unfortunately...), .... until it trips again. > >> A lot of trips can be caused by changing environment (heat, > >> humidity, etc.) that bring the conditions for over current just to > >> the trip point, but will not under normal conditions. > >> However I am no specialist, not even building anything at this time > >> - so, I will try to find out for this specific application (AS350B3) > >> > >> Thomas > >> > >> PS: First thing I am going to do is to consult the Maintenance/ > >> Repair manual.... > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: Al Gietzen > >> To: Rotary motors in aircraft > >> Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2007 6:10 PM > >> Subject: [FlyRotary] CBs and fuses > >> > >> > >> Eurocopter Factory Instructors are VERY COMPETENT in Eurocopter > >> Helicopter Systems!! > >> > >> There is absolutely NO doubt that he knows the difference between > >> fuses and breakers and WHY either one would be used. > >> > >> > >> Thomas; > >> > >> Certainly not impugning the competence of the flight instructors; > >> just suggesting the design engineers may have other reasons than > >> cost. One may be reliability. The reliability of CBs goes down > >> significantly after they have experienced a 'trip'. I recall > >> reading one experts opinion that a CB should be replaced after a > >> 'trip'. Yeah; seems extreme. The modern philosophy of circuit > >> design is to design for fault tolerance, so a fault; once causing > >> the protection device to open, is left for repair when you land. > >> > >> > >> The key for using fuses is fault tolerant circuit design and proper > >> selection and sizing of fuses. Having done this; studies suggest > >> that the fuse offers higher reliability and lower cost. > >> > >> > >> There certainly reasons for either CBs or fuses, and I have both in > >> my plane. For my flight critical circuits I opted for simple, > >> fault tolerance and fuses. I wouldn't argue with someone making a > >> different choice. > >> > >> > >> FWIW, > >> > >> > >> Al > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > > > > -- > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/