X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Received: from conrad.preludeconcepts.com ([64.18.208.18] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1846213 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:15:54 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.18.208.18; envelope-from=crj@lucubration.com Received: from [10.201.1.6] (unknown [10.201.1.6]) by conrad.preludeconcepts.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECAC17CC158 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:14:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <45D92479.4070509@lucubration.com> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 23:15:53 -0500 From: Chad Robinson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: CBs and fuses References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Spam-Status: No Wendell Voto wrote: > Concerning the PTC devices, I was interested in them and a friend also > building a Cozy wants to use the PTC devices but I am reluctant to say > to use them. If correct, many of the ones Mouser lists that allow > high current (1 - 18 amp) seem to have an awfully high holding > current; that is, the current to maintain the device temp to hold it > in the tripped state. Be careful of the device you choose, it's > holding current could be 50% of the trip value (Littel 30R series for > instance). This would not be good for protecting the wiring. That's not a bad point, but I would argue that wiring isn't the issue here. If you properly size your breaker to protect your wiring, then (by definition) 50% of the rated current shouldn't hurt your wiring at all. I think the bigger issue is that the device could be drawing 50% current - it's through the device that the current goes, after all, unless there's a short. Suppose you protect your nose gear with one. If it trips, but 50% current is still allowed to flow, it could still be pulling that wheel up against blockage and could still do some damage. Also, if you don't realize this is going on, it could be bad for some loads such as motors. I prefer manual reset devices in these cases because you KNOW what's happening. It's either tripped, or it isn't, and both states are well defined as long as the contacts don't weld (and that's another story). May I make a suggestion? Fuse vs. CB discussions border on religion to some people, and this list isn't really intended for electrical discussions. I'd recommend moving the discussion to Aeroelectric or (if you don't like Bob's fuse bias) some other forum other than this one. It's been an interesting discussion, but frankly, both options have merits (so the discussion could continue for a LONG time) and neither one is really specific to a rotary. Just my 2c. Regards, Chad