X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 50 [XX] (100%) RECEIVED: Received headers not consistent with Juno "FROM:" Return-Path: Received: from m12.lax.untd.com ([64.136.30.75] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with SMTP id 1843916 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 12:35:52 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.136.30.75; envelope-from=alwick@juno.com Received: from m12.lax.untd.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by m12.lax.untd.com with SMTP id AABC7QRFNAJ2KZJA for (sender ); Sat, 17 Feb 2007 09:34:36 -0800 (PST) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: L941HVjjYzDhN3itp//mkESfHp6ldUeavNEwh0a1lkOJhvwPJXOtoA== Received: (from alwick@juno.com) by m12.lax.untd.com (jqueuemail) id MES3CXAB; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 09:34:21 PST To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 09:33:29 -0800 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Cowling and engine installation RV 7A Message-ID: <20070217.093334.2628.8.alwick@juno.com> X-Mailer: Juno 5.0.49 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=--__JNP_000_0cf8.35a2.5b49 X-Juno-Line-Breaks: 8-6,8-11,13-18,21-30,32,34-35,36-32767 From: al p wick X-ContentStamp: 9:4:2023339713 X-MAIL-INFO:1c9898c938c8b58848594dc9914df1495ca8d14d9d5835ed389dd1a89da19dd8dd6cad2898f5c995c9a938dcf17968dc88c8c56cbcb9619c0dac2578316cf1e8ccece515e56581a1b1e5 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 127.0.0.1|localhost|m12.lax.untd.com|alwick@juno.com This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ----__JNP_000_0cf8.35a2.5b49 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Actually, the opposite is true. Rigid regulator would force all movement stress on tubing. -al On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:51:08 -0600 "Russell Duffy" writes: Here is one photo of the pressure regulator and bypass plumbing showing the aluminum tubing used - question - is the al. tubing OK on the firewall or should I replace it with flexable line? Hi Dennis, If the regulator is mounted very rigidly (not just to the stainless firewall), I'd say the aluminum line is probably OK. The key is relative motion of course. Also incluced are pictures of the installed James Rotary cowl with most of the painting finished!! Absolutely beautiful !!! Cheers, Rusty (RV-8 probably sold) -al wick Cozy IV powered by Turbo Subaru 3.0R with variable valve lift and cam timing. Artificial intelligence in cockpit, N9032U 240+ hours from Portland, Oregon Glass panel design, Subaru install, Prop construct, Risk assessment info: http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html ----__JNP_000_0cf8.35a2.5b49 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Actually, the opposite is true. Rigid regulator would force all=20 movement stress on tubing.
 
-al
 
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:51:08 -0600 "Russell Duffy" <rusty@radrotary.com> writes:

Here is one photo of the pressure regulator and bypass= =20 plumbing showing
the aluminum tubing used - question - is the al.=20 tubing  OK on the
firewall or should I replace it with flexable=20 line?

Hi=20 Dennis,
 
If the = regulator is=20 mounted very rigidly (not just to the stainless firewall), I'd say the=20 aluminum line is probably OK.  The key is relative motion of=20 course. 


Also incluced = are pictures=20 of the installed James Rotary cowl with most
of the painting finished!= !

Absolutely beautiful !!!&= nbsp;=20

Cheers,
Rusty (RV-8 probably=20 sold)
 

-al wick
Cozy IV powered by Turbo = Subaru=20 3.0R with variable valve lift and cam timing.
Artificial intelligence = in=20 cockpit, N9032U 240+ hours from Portland, Oregon
Glass panel design, = Subaru=20 install, Prop construct, Risk assessment=20 info:
http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html
----__JNP_000_0cf8.35a2.5b49--