X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from web56310.mail.re3.yahoo.com ([216.252.110.234] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.6) with SMTP id 1463981 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 11:44:21 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.252.110.234; envelope-from=phil@c-func.com Received: (qmail 65920 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Oct 2006 15:44:01 -0000 Message-ID: <20061013154401.65914.qmail@web56310.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Received: from [205.194.74.10] by web56310.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:44:01 PDT Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 08:44:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Phillip Kaye Subject: newbie To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all,=0A=0AI'm new to this group. I'm at the beginning of an RV-9A co= nstruction (working on rudder now). As I'm sure everyone does at the begin= ning, I've been spending a lot of time thinking ahead about hte choices I'l= l have to make later on. I'm very interested in the Rotary option, and hav= e tonnes of questions. A few that come to mind initially:=0A=0A1) I would = probably go with a 4-port Renesis. Would most of the conversion informatio= n that is available for the older RX-7 engines be applicable to the new eng= ines? Or would I have to solve a bunch of problems from scratch, without b= eing able to draw much on the experience of others who have done older 13B = conversions?=0A=0A2) One of my biggest concerns about auto-conversions is w= eight. The rotary enthusiasts claim it has very low weight. The anti-auto= -conversion people point out that much of the extra weight in a conversion = comes from all the extra stuff you have to modify or add to make it work pr= operly. What would the real final installed wieght of a renesis on an RV-9= be, compared with an O-320 installation (i.e. not just engine weight, but = total installed weight)?=0A=0A3) Power - Subaru auto conversions are popula= r in RVs. However, people put in Subie engines that are advertised to be 1= 65 HP, but at the prop they develop much less power, and a popular complain= t is that these aircraft end-up being slow, and under-powered. What is the= case with a Rotary? If I put a Renesis on an RV-9A, would this give me as= much power as an O-320? Do I need a CS prop? My strong preference is to = use a FP prop.=0A=0A4) Money - assuming I buy a remanufactured engine from = Mazda or somewhere else (i.e. buy a remanufactured engine and not overhaul = an older engine myself), how much money will I really save, after you accou= nt for all the accessories and modifications?=0A=0AThanks for any advice yo= u folks can offer on these questions!=0A=0APhil Kaye =0A =0A_____________= ______________________=0APhillip Kaye=0ARV-9A Ser# 91440=0AC-FUNC(reserved)= =0Awww.c-func.com