|
|
In a message dated 10/10/2006 7:41:10 PM Pacific Standard Time,
ceengland@bellsouth.net writes:
I
must respectfully offer a somewhat modified view.
In general, crimped
connectors are only reliable if done with very high quality crimpers,
costing many 10's to hundreds of dollars. In a production environment, big
bucks for a crimper means any klutz who can squeeze can be very
productive.
Soldered joints are prone to corrosion only if corrosive
flux is used. Improperly crimped pins can have corrosion within the joint,
just like a riveted or bolted structural joint. Crystallizing is a product
of improper technique, not the soldering process itself. Breakage from
vibration is an issue with either technique; the stress riser on a
crimped joint is much sharper than a soldered joint. Proper support just
outside the joint is the remedy, whichever process is
chosen.
Milled pins are certainly better than the rolled sheet metal
pins, but with proper technique, they can be soldered with relatively
inexpensive equipment.
FWIW,
Charlie
Charlie
This is one of those where people must agree to disagree. Get the proper
crimpers, you need only buy them once. Far to many failures occur due to
incidentals and ancillary systems. The milled pins or even the better rolled
pins work with the crimper to form the best possible connection. The conductor
is crimped in the pin and the insulator is captured by the "tails" of the pin
forming a sort of strain relief. This isn't possible with the soldered pins
regardless of how good your technique is. Even a perfect solder joint is
more likely to break. We need solder joints on circuit boards but crimps are
better for everything else. The US Navy now uses crimp connectors on everything.
They can "afford" it of course at our expense. If you live in Florida or
California's coastal area corrosion could be a factor. Any coastal area for that
matter.
Bill Jepson
|
|