Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com ([24.93.67.84] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.4) with ESMTP id 2601008 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:59:28 -0400 Received: from o7y6b5 (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20]) by ms-smtp-03.southeast.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with SMTP id h8O2vC4S018902 for ; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:57:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <000701c38247$8467f440$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "flyrotary" Subject: DIE => Ed's DIE => Ed DIE = "EDDIE effect"???? Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 22:56:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Ok, Marv and folks In deference to those of you who view the acronym "DIE" as being more ominous than you cared for. I started trying to think of some "catchy" alternative. I sort of concluded that perhaps I shouldn't call my work the "Mazda DIE" as Mazda might just take exception to be so associated it. Besides, they never divulged their equations (if they ever took the time to derive any). So I got as far as "Ed's DIE" as an alternative, when my wife looking over my shoulder suggested dropping the " 's" leaving "Ed DIE" or "EDDIE" effect. What'da ya think?{:>). Sort of has a ring to it don't you think. Hey, got to try for immortality somehow. Ok, Ok, back to the drawing board. Just ordered the slides for the presentation (boy, the internet is sure neat for some things) - not sure you guys are worth the cost, thought - but, a free beer here and there would probably mollify me. {:>). Heck, just foregoing the tomatoes would probably do. Ed Ed Anderson RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com