Return-Path: Received: from relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.36] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.4) with ESMTP id 2600699 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:03:02 -0400 Received: (qmail 2860 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2003 21:03:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frontiernet.net) ([170.215.98.47]) (envelope-sender ) by relay03.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.6) with SMTP for ; 23 Sep 2003 21:03:01 -0000 Message-ID: <3F70A788.3BB1FE89@frontiernet.net> Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:05:28 -0400 From: Jim Sower X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Power on a cold day was Re: [FlyRotary]Re:Some turbo thoughts from a pro .... References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------DB334B51125001F6A12E2855" --------------DB334B51125001F6A12E2855 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bob, Me thinks you couldn't be more right :o( Me thinks I couldn't be more embarrassed {{:<(( A bit off is one thing, off by an order of magnitude is another. Forgot the sanity check and just flailed away at it. So there has to be some other explanation why Ed's Mazda and my Lyc behave so much better on cold days. Back to the drawing board ... Jim S. Bob Darrah wrote: > Jim, me thinks you might be off by a decimal place or two in > your rate of climb increase figures. I figure an additional > 33 fpm (total 1033fpm) with a 2hp increase. Also just a > theoryBob Darrah > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Jim Sower > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:19 AM > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Power on a cold day was Re: > [FlyRotary] Re:Some turbo thoughts from a pro .... > > > > True. But that 2% increase in power is ALL EXCESS > THRUST (over and above what it takes to hold exactly > what you've got - say 90 kts and 1000 fpm climb). > Two hp would be 66000 #'/min which with a 2000# > airplane produces 3300 fpm rate of climb - ABOVE > what you started with !! Just a theory .... Jim S. > -- Jim Sower Crossville, TN; Chapter 5 Long-EZ N83RT, Velocity N4095T --------------DB334B51125001F6A12E2855 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Bob,
Me thinks you couldn't be more right :o(  Me thinks I couldn't be more embarrassed {{:<((  A bit off is one thing, off by an order of magnitude is another.  Forgot the sanity check and just flailed away at it.  So there has to be some other explanation why Ed's Mazda and my Lyc behave so much better on cold days.
Back to the drawing board ... Jim S.

Bob Darrah wrote:

Jim,  me thinks you might be off by a decimal place or two in your rate of climb increase figures.  I figure an additional 33 fpm (total 1033fpm) with a 2hp increase. Also just a theoryBob Darrah
----- Original Message -----
From: Jim Sower
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 9:19 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Power on a cold day was Re: [FlyRotary] Re:Some turbo thoughts from a pro ....
 


True.  But that 2% increase in power is ALL EXCESS THRUST (over and above what it takes to hold exactly what you've got - say 90 kts and 1000 fpm climb).  Two hp would be 66000 #'/min which with a 2000# airplane produces 3300 fpm rate of climb - ABOVE what you started with !!  Just a theory .... Jim S.

--
Jim Sower
Crossville, TN; Chapter 5
Long-EZ N83RT, Velocity N4095T
  --------------DB334B51125001F6A12E2855--