Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.162.248] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.3)
  with HTTP id 2588971 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:50:00 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: DIE Power Calculations
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.3
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 08:50:00 -0400
Message-ID: <web-2588971@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-2588378@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

"Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com> wrote:

>>> However, I am not familiar with your installation.  IF you are using an
intercooler with your tubo (recommended), I have a feeling that the Finite
Amplitude Wave (FA) would be disrupted to some extend by the intercooler -
Just not certain how much and what effect that would have.  It might
considerably diminish the DIE or not - just don't know.<<<

Seems to me that the intercooler should have no effect on the DIE (if it works 
with a turboed engine).... the intercooler is upstream of the throttle body 
and not part of the path of your FAW.  Based on all of what's been said about 
DIE it appears to me that it is defined by the intake runners and the chamber 
that mounts the throttle body, and doesn't go past the throttle body into the 
infeed of the intake system.  That puts the intercooler in non-FAW territory, 
doesn't it?

    <marv>