Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com ([24.93.67.83] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3) with ESMTP id 2588391 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 20:49:51 -0400 Received: from o7y6b5 (clt78-020.carolina.rr.com [24.93.78.20]) by ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.2) with SMTP id h8M0k0pN003757 for ; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 20:46:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <00a301c380a3$279051e0$1702a8c0@WorkGroup> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: One Rotor Counterweight was Re: [FlyRotary] Counterwieght newbie question. Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 20:47:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Zutrauen" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2003 8:45 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Counterwieght newbie question. Hi Folks, Apologies in advance for a simple question. I have noticed on a couple of postings that there is a counterweight on the front of the main shaft. If this is to counterbalance the eccentricity of the rotors, how do they accommodate two or even three rotors, since I assume they are offset? Is the balance a compromise on a multi-rotor engine? In a single-rotor engine, is it possible to fully balance the engine using this counterweight? Or would the counterweight need to be excessively heavy? Thanks in advance, ...Now back to regularly scheduled reasonable questions :-) Pete Europa builder Hi Pete, There is a counter weight on the front and rear of the two rotor engine that provides the dynamic balancing. Not familar with the three or one rotor. I would think the one rotor would require a massive counterweight - but there are a couple of people on the list building one rotor engines - perhaps they would jump in with the correct answer. Ed Anderson