X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from rtp-iport-2.cisco.com ([64.102.122.149] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.8) with ESMTP id 1043774 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:57:49 -0500 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2006 10:57:03 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.03,123,1141621200"; d="scan'208"; a="84807549:sNHT94390104" Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k2NFv2Wc023142 for ; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:57:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:56:56 -0500 Received: from [64.102.38.229] ([64.102.38.229]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:57:02 -0500 Message-ID: <4422C54E.20203@nc.rr.com> Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 10:57:02 -0500 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.4.1 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: pitot inlet References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Mar 2006 15:57:02.0494 (UTC) FILETIME=[6CD83BE0:01C64E92] Dale Rogers wrote: > > >From the archives, another useful link: > >http://www.frigidair.net/Parts/product_EV.html > >Look for EV6203 > > > Dale, I had looked at that sight a few times, but had never seen the 'more' button on the right hand extreme of the scrolling list at the bottom. That opened up a whole new world!! I like the looks of EV4798732PF and EV4798751PF. The former is 12.125x9.5x4.125 and the latter is 8.25x11x4.125. Since I'm stuck with a long duct, I might as well milk the pressure recovery for all its worth. The extra thickness will be a good thing in this case, I think. More than that, the hose connections look really beefy, and don't extend past the outer boundary of the radiator profile. That will make the installation a little easier. -- ,|"|"|, Ernest Christley | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta Builder | o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org |