Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #30173
From: rijakits <rijakits@cwpanama.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Diesel Operation
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:03:16 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob White" <rlwhite@comcast.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 6:53 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Diesel Operation


On Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:34:37 -0500
Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com> wrote:

> Bob White wrote:
>
> >Hi Ernest,
> >
> >I have high compression rotors (9.7:1) so maybe all I need is the turbo
> >and propane. ;-)  Long ago I was thinking about adding a supercharger
> >after I got the NA setup working (normalization only).  After the
> >length of time this has taken, I don't think it will ever happen.
> >
> >Bob W. (leaky tank sealed - leak check tomorrow)
> >
> >
> >
> Working from a fading memory here, but I believe diesels run closer to
27:1.
> Ford tried to convert a gas engine to diesel operation in the '80s by
> just driving up the compression.  By all accounts, it sucked.  It ran,
> just not for long.  The high compression basically rip apart the lighter
> gas engine parts.
> I don't think the rotary would suffer those issues, and it might even
> solve the problem of fuel not burning in the chamber corners, but I'm
> probably wrong.
>

I don't think the rotary can be made to run in diesel mode.
Compression ratios just can't get into that range.  Mistral is using
diesel fuel with spark ignition.

Bob W.

I think John Deere tried ( or was it Rolls Royce...??): Dual Rotor setup,
the first Rotor worked as a compressor to precompress the air - efficiency
didn't work out....

TJ

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster