X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.196] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.4) with ESMTP id 889036 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 18:07:10 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.184.196; envelope-from=wdleonard@gmail.com Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i34so1316392wra for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:06:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=jwmP23IwMBL5vXlRj1v4W3sTBZc7aiXv/LVCW+rIEDCYwAKzUWzoHzBNgjbvxp9DnfRNEymZAMOCrjjbPEhf8bdKDivGgTP6eU1pK2dwhzPbGF/hSAqjOsr5GXSq2l3juk5Oh2Ujz5NVUB0E2mKuV7I6SVQFISp8H5J+k6ebQos= Received: by 10.64.131.17 with SMTP id e17mr3524741qbd; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:06:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.151.9 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:06:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1c23473f0512191506w7b03f4b2la61055043bc1eeb7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:06:26 -0800 From: David Leonard To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Props In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_17179_10196645.1135033586096" References: ------=_Part_17179_10196645.1135033586096 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Oh, BTW Bully. You will also note that at 6000 RPM the prop is doing 2750 which a lot of certified props will turn, even if 74"long. Also, short prop are not necessarily less efficient, its just that the spee= d of peak efficiency is shifted to a higher airspeed, and probably that peak is a little more narrow. Dave Leonard On 12/19/05, Buly wrote: > > Yesterday somebody gave me the formulas to calculate the prop tip > speed. I did some calculations and looks like us with the 2.17 > redrives are kind of painted in the corner. Hope I'm wrong, but if I > want to keep the tips from going supersonic, I have to cut down the > prop to 64" or keep the engine below 5500 RPM. The choice is either > inefficient prop and adequate power, or efficient long prop and not > getting all the power from the engine? Am I wrong? > Buly > atlasyts@bellsouth.net > > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > -- Dave Leonard Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/vp4skydoc/index.html ------=_Part_17179_10196645.1135033586096 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline
Oh, BTW Bully.  You will also note that at 6000 RPM the prop is d= oing 2750 which a lot of certified props will turn, even if 74"long.
 
Also, short prop are not necessarily less efficient, its just that the= speed of peak efficiency is shifted to a higher airspeed, and probably tha= t peak is a little more narrow.
 
Dave Leonard

 
On 12/19/05, Buly <atlasyts@bellsouth.= net> wrote:
Yesterday somebody gave me the f= ormulas to calculate the prop tip
speed. I did some calculations and loo= ks like us with the=20 2.17
redrives are kind of painted in the corner. Hope I'm wrong, but if = I
want to keep the tips from going supersonic, I have to cut down theprop to 64" or keep the engine below 5500 RPM. The choice is either
inefficient prop and adequate power, or efficient long prop and not
= getting all the power from the engine? Am I wrong?
Buly
atlasyts@bellsouth.net




--
Homepage:  http://www= .flyrotary.com/
Archive and UnSub:   http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/f= lyrotary/



--
Dave Leonard
Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4= VY
http= ://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/vp4skydoc/index.html=20 ------=_Part_17179_10196645.1135033586096--