X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.103] (HELO ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.4) with ESMTP id 887633 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:45:23 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.103; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from [192.168.0.253] (cpe-066-057-036-199.nc.res.rr.com [66.57.36.199]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id jBJ0iW1u002373 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:44:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43A6026B.4030009@nc.rr.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:44:27 -0500 From: Ernest Christley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Fuel filter selection Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine It's time to select a fuel filter. I know it's a little oversized, but I'm running 3/8" fuel lines at least to the firewall, just to make sure I'll never run into a restriction problem with fuel delivery (at least not a restriction that can be attributed to undersized lines). I'm trying to source a part for filters right now, but I'm not sure what constitutes good numbers. The Earl's filter I'm looking at says that it traps down to 85microns and is good for 4 to 5gpm. That would translate to 300gph? Does it strain well enough to act as the primary filter? http://store.summitracing.com/default.asp?target=partdetail.asp&autofilter=1&part=EAR%2D230206ERL&N=115&autoview=sku -- This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)."