X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.3) with ESMTP id 868230 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:29:55 -0500 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.71.176.71; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Dec 2005 08:28:53 -0800 Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jB8GSLQa023314 for ; Thu, 8 Dec 2005 08:28:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 11:28:48 -0500 Received: from [64.102.45.251] ([64.102.45.251]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 8 Dec 2005 11:28:48 -0500 Message-ID: <43985F3E.40607@nc.rr.com> Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:28:46 -0500 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Excommunication References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Dec 2005 16:28:48.0946 (UTC) FILETIME=[77CDF920:01C5FC14] Lehanover@aol.com wrote: > He has little time for those who refuse to look up anything on their > own, and, or, insist on constructing failure prone contraptions that > will damage the rotary's (and home building in general) already > doubtful reputation. > > But then, I could be (and often am) wrong. > > Lynn E. Hanover > I think that is the point Lynn. Here, you may be wrong (and you'll here about it if you are) but at least you're heard. I don't seem to be hearing that Paul is technically inept (except that he has never flown anything he's built), but that they think his interpersonal skill are somewhat deficient. I don't have a dog in this fight. I was lucky enough to find this list first. But I've been involved in list and newsgroups where a person or persons attempted to quell discussion or block the introduction of ideas, because they know better than us poor unwashed souls. Instead of providing an education, or even stating their case, they would prefer that we bow down and plead for the crumbs of knowleged that they decide we deserve. That is a derisive attitude, and it sticks in the craw of those on the recieving end. I bow down to God and the laws of physics...not some egotistical snot that claims to have a personal line to the inside workings of either. A preacher or discussion list moderator that doesn't allow open discussion of meritorious topics is trying to hide something...usually their own deficiencies. -- ,|"|"|, | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta | o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org |