X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [216.148.227.89] (HELO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c7) with ESMTP id 800446 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:27:01 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.148.227.89; envelope-from=rlwhite@comcast.net Received: from quail (bgp01386375bgs.brodwy01.nm.comcast.net[68.35.160.229]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with SMTP id <2005103114261401400t1a7ae>; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:26:14 +0000 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:26:13 -0700 From: Bob White To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Shady Bend Report Message-Id: <20051031072613.6d9a80d6.rlwhite@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.5 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Mike, Many people insist on using that html stuff for email. That wouldn't be so bad if the html format would honor the email tradition of marking the old stuff with a '>', but they don't. There is an html MIME attachment on the messages. When I get totally confused, I open that with my web browser. Then the old stuff is marked with a line down the side, everyone has their own color of text, etc. Very colorful if nothing else. :) Bob W. On Mon, 31 Oct 2005 03:51:46 -0800 (PST) Michael LaFleur wrote: > This bugs the crap out of me. > > In the e-mail below, how am I supposed to determine > which is the response? The only thing I can do is read > the whole thing or ignore it. Most often I just ignore > it and move on to the next message. > > Mike > > --- george lendich wrote: > > > Message > > Ed, > > Did Richard have anything with the new side > > housing running yet. > > George (down under) > > > > Hi Rusty, > > > > Yes, Rich told me about wheel landing with a prop > > that was longer (well, maybe not now) than he was > > used to. Just glad no worst than that. The prop he > > had on enabled him to get up to 6600 rpm he stated - > > forgot to ask if that was on take off/static or in > > the air. Still looked and sounded good. > > > > Yes, I think you would be interested in what > > Richard Shon had done with his one rotor. You might > > be interested in his side housing. Too bad you > > could not make it. Hope to see you next year. > > > > Ed > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Russell Duffy > > To: Rotary motors in aircraft > > Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 10:10 PM > > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Shady Bend Report > > > > > > Yes, we had Rusty's Rotary show up (sans Rusty), > > guess I'm going to have to stop calling it Rusty's. > > Rich came to the flyin to learn more about the > > rotary engine, so the RV-3 is in good hands. In > > fact, I saw Finn eyeing it with a gleam in his eye. > > > > Hi Ed, > > > > Thanks for the kind comments, and great report. > > I actually thought I'd get an RV-7 friend of mine to > > fly me over yesterday, and figured it would be > > interesting to walk around anonymously :-) He > > already had plans though, so maybe next year. > > > > You're right about the plane being in good hands > > with Rich Nadig. There are very few people that I > > would have been comfortable selling the plane to, > > but he's certainly one of them. It should really be > > nice by the time he gets done fine tuning some > > things. Might need to add a wheel on the front to > > protect the prop though :-) > > > > I spent the week finishing up the single rotor > > engine installation. I'll post some pics later in > > the week, when it's closer to being done. Total > > weight is around 235 lbs. With any luck, I can make > > a leisurely flight to next years roundup. > > > > Cheers, > > Rusty (maybe canceling the Sonex order tomorrow) > > > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ -- http://www.bob-white.com N93BD - Rotary Powered BD-4 (projected engine start in November) Custom Cables for your rotary installation - http://www.roblinphoto.com/shop/