X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c7) with ESMTP id 790478 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:59:22 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.64; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from ibm58aec.bellsouth.net ([65.6.194.9]) by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20051027155837.UMSV26224.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm58aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:58:37 -0400 Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by ibm58aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20051027155837.HRIP10162.ibm58aec.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 11:58:37 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: socketless hose question for Lynn and Todd Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:58:36 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c5db0f$4a710380$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5DAE5.619AFB80" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5DAE5.619AFB80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings, =20 Lynn, you said you were running the blue Aeroquip hose (assuming this is marked FC332), and that it was on your oil pressure loop. You aren't = using a stock oil pump are you? Would your pump have the same violent pulses = that the stock pump used to kill my old evap core cooler? =20 =20 Todd, is the Parker stuff you're using the same as the Aeroquip FC332? = You are using this with a stock oil pump I presume. I looked up Parker #836 = and found that it doesn't have the same disclaimer, so maybe it's not really = the same hose. =20 =20 The reason I ask is that the specs on the FC332 hose say "Not = recommended for hydraulic impulse applications". I'm wondering if that rules out = use for oil pressure in our case. On the single rotor installation, the = only oil pressure hose is coming from the front cover, to the filter = pedestal, and I'm wondering if I should just use normal high pressure hose instead = of the socketless stuff. =20 =20 Thanks, Rusty (gotta mount that muffler today) =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5DAE5.619AFB80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message
Greetings,
 
Lynn, you said = you were=20 running the blue Aeroquip hose (assuming this is marked FC332), and that = it was=20 on your oil pressure loop.  You aren't using a stock oil pump are=20 you?  Would your pump have the same violent pulses that the stock = pump used=20 to kill my old evap core cooler? 
 
Todd,  is = the Parker=20 stuff you're using the same as the Aeroquip FC332?  You are using = this with=20 a stock oil pump I presume.  I looked up Parker #836 and found that = it=20 doesn't have the same disclaimer, so maybe it's not really the same = hose. =20
 
The reason I = ask is that=20 the specs on the FC332 hose say "Not recommended for hydraulic impulse=20 applications".  I'm wondering if that rules out use for oil = pressure in our=20 case.  On the single rotor installation, the only oil pressure hose = is=20 coming from the front cover, to the filter pedestal, and I'm wondering = if I=20 should just use normal high pressure hose instead of the socketless = stuff. =20
 
Thanks,
Rusty (gotta = mount that=20 muffler today)
 
 
------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C5DAE5.619AFB80--