In a message dated 10/10/2005 9:03:58 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
eanderson@carolina.rr.com writes:
And you wonder why we prefer a Rotary over an expensive,
certified engine??. I think the certification part only means it
is certified to break and cost mucho money. You would think
after their crankshaft fiasco they would be more careful in QA. Repair
cost (even with free parts) apparently will cost on the order of
$16,000.
Dave, here is another one for your file.
Ed A
As an Ex QA guy, I suggest that they have no Quality Assurance system at
all.
The most vestigial of systems could have saved them (and the flying public)
millions.
A recent visit to a well known propeller manufacturer revealed that the
utter lack of a recognized quality system is not unusual in the aircraft
industry.
When in doubt, specify MIL-I-45208. And then watch them crap their pants
trying to pass the first visit from your friendly government employee.
Lynn E. Hanover
DOD/DLA/DSCC/ABA
retired.