Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.71.176.72; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <434525D3.3040305@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:25:39 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: counterweights
References: <list-751347@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-751347@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

David Leonard wrote:

> Who thinks it might be a good idea to randomly shave off a little bit 
> of my counter weight and see if that makes anything better?  :-)


What if you're already to light?  Would it be better to attach something 
to the inside of the raised portion?  Here's a random brain fart...drill 
and tap a hole in the raised portion.  Adjust a bolt in or out to dial 
in the perfect balance.

-- 
         ,|"|"|,                                    |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----        Dyke Delta         |
        o|  d  |o          www.ernest.isa-geek.org  |