X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from web81204.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.177] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with SMTP id 718115 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 00:27:28 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.190.37.177; envelope-from=mike.lafleur@sbcglobal.net Received: (qmail 48056 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Sep 2005 04:26:22 -0000 Message-ID: <20050911042622.48054.qmail@web81204.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.221.70.202] by web81204.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 21:26:22 PDT Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 21:26:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael LaFleur Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Overvoltage control (help Ed A) To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In the case of a load dump, where the battery is disconnected for a charging circuit, you will see more than 100 volts. The alternator, being low impedance will cause large positive transients. Simultabeously, the collapsing field will cause negative field decay transients. These can and will be in excess of 100 volts. All charging systems should have protection for this. Don't you? --- Jim Sower wrote: > > > Finn Lassen wrote: > > > I think the +100 volts statement relates to no > battery load. Have you > > /anyone actually /seen/ that happen? I guess if > the electrical system > > was designed so that a contactor could disconnect > the battery from the > > load circuits and the load circuits (avionics) > still be connected to > > the alternator you would have a situation where > you could wave your > > avionics goodbye. > > Perhaps. But that wouldn't be very clever. > Anyone who designed his > > system to protect his avionics from a Battery over > voltage and ignored > > the Alternator deserves whatever happens. > > Let's say on top of that that one (or all) of the > three retifiers > > shorted out too, you'd have 100 volts A/C into > your avionics. Not a > > pretty picture. (I've seen Zener diodes short out > regularily due to > > overload/voltage; rectifier diodes usually fail > open - but not > > always). We're stretching a bit here aren't we? > Back to the 100 V > > that we've already agreed can't happen, shorted > diodes causing AC > > (which I'm not at all sure can happen), all three > rectifiers (that's > > all SIX diodes shorting at the same time (none of > them failing open > > which is more common), zener failing, etc. If a > diode fails every > > 1000 hrs, the whole bank failing would happen > every 1000^6 hours. > > That's a one with TWENTY ONE zeros behind it. > > I think I can live with that ... Jim S. > > > > > Finn > > > > Jim Sower wrote: > > > >> <... the alternator is capable of producing over > 100 volts ...> > >> I don't think so ... > >> ... > >> Bottom line, with the regulator failed (or > bypassed) to send full B+ > >> voltage to the field, the charging voltage never > exceed 18V in my > >> experience. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > > Archive and UnSub: > http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > > >