X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [206.46.252.40] (HELO vms040pub.verizon.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTP id 717938 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 18:08:25 -0400 Received: from verizon.net ([71.99.169.87]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2 HotFix 0.04 (built Dec 24 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0IMM00FOCG5O2EJD@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:08:13 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 18:08:08 -0400 From: Finn Lassen Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Overvoltage control (help Ed A) In-reply-to: To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-id: <43235948.7030203@verizon.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en-us, en References: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax; PROMO) I think the +100 volts statement relates to no battery load. I guess if the electrical system was designed so that a contactor could disconnect the battery from the load circuits and the load circuits (avionics) still be connected to the alternator you would have a situation where you could wave your avionics goodbye. Let's say on top of that that one (or all) of the three retifiers shorted out too, you'd have 100 volts A/C into your avionics. Not a pretty picture. (I've seen Zener diodes short out regularily due to overload/voltage; rectifier diodes usually fail open - but not always). Finn Jim Sower wrote: > <... the alternator is capable of producing over 100 volts ...> > I don't think so ... > ... > Bottom line, with the regulator failed (or bypassed) to send full B+ > voltage to the field, the charging voltage never exceed 18V in my > experience.