X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.167] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTP id 717735 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 15:30:07 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.133.182.167; envelope-from=canarder@frontiernet.net Received: from filter09.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter09.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.76]) by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1665358270 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 19:29:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.167]) by filter09.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter09.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.76]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23067-01-80 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 19:29:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [70.98.128.118]) by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DC6358280 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 19:29:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <43233409.9070207@frontiernet.net> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 14:29:13 -0500 From: Jim Sower User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Overvoltage control (help Ed A) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0536-5, 09/09/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at filter09.roc.ny.frontiernet.net No. It is designed to output 14.4 - 14.7V and that's what it does. I think adjustments are for units that wander a lot and won't hold a setting. Why would I want to adjust what's right (Harvey's Second Law) ... Jim S. Mark R Steitle wrote: >Is your internally regulated alternator adjustable? > >-----Original Message----- >From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On >Behalf Of Jim Sower >Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 2:32 PM >To: Rotary motors in aircraft >Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Overvoltage control (help Ed A) > >If my crowbar overvoltage opens the B+ circuit, there's NO current >flowing out of the alternator. Absent current, there can be no heat >generated. The field can go to max output, there will be high voltage >at the B+ terminal, but no heat generated. Sounds to me like a bogus >concern. I think the key issue is "... Nuckolls expressed dislike ..." >and no further support is "needed". > >Still looking for a "real" reason ... Jim S. > >Mark R Steitle wrote: > > > >>Jim, >>I first explored this issue after Bob Knuckols expressed a dislike of >>internally regulated alternators...because they can fail in such a way >>that you cannot shut them down. Yes, you can interrupt the "B" lead, >>but this will not shut down the alternator. I imagine it could get hot >>enough to self-destruct and possibly catch fire. >> >>The modification I use removes the internal regulator assembly and puts >>a direct (external) feed line to one of the brushes. The other brush >> >> >is > > >>tied to ground. Nothing else is connected to the field. With this >>arrangement, can you explain how removing power from one of the brushes >>will allow the alternator to continue producing power? I've tested my >>modified alternators with the engine running and it does in fact stop >>producing power when I cut the power to this lead. >> >>Another benefit to an external regulator is that you can precisely >>adjust the voltage, provided you use an adjustable regulator. >> >>Mark S. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On >>Behalf Of Jim Sower >>Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 5:31 PM >>To: Rotary motors in aircraft >>Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Overvoltage control (help Ed A) >> >>I've always been puzzled why folks would go to all the trouble of >>disabling a perfectly good internal regulator so as to install an >>external unit. If the Field circuit gets somehow internally shorted to >> >> > > > >>the output circuit, the alternator is going to run away and create an >>over voltage condition. In that event, there's no way that turning off >> >> > > > >>current to the Field is going to help you. Other than a short >>described, I don't know how an over voltage can occur. So my question >>is: is an internally regulated system all that much more apt to have >> >> >an > > >>over voltage type failure, and if so why? I've had lots of trouble >> >> >with > > >>externally regulated alternators, very little with internal regulators. >> >>My crowbar over voltage system is bullet proof. It's the only scheme >>that prevents damage caused by an internal short in the alternator. >>What, exactly, is the big attraction of external regulators? ... Jim S. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >-- >Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > >-- >Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ > > > >