X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [129.116.87.142] (HELO MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c2) with ESMTP id 716692 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 11:28:06 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=129.116.87.142; envelope-from=mark.steitle@austin.utexas.edu X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: Overvoltage control (help Ed A) Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 10:27:20 -0500 Message-ID: <87DBA06C9A5CB84B80439BA09D86E69E0267E617@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: Overvoltage control (help Ed A) Thread-Index: AcW1QuX79mnZWhX1S2GBslr5/ZdWWgAAGp8w From: "Mark R Steitle" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Mark, The self destruct fire item is the only reason that I see to go beyond interrupting the B lead. Interesting my ND alterator does shut down when I shut the power field off and it is internally regulated. I thought that was normal, but there were potential internal failures that could trigger the runaway alternator and then I would not be able to shut it down. Is that confused thinking or why am I able to shut it down while running? Bernie=20 >=20 > Bernie, If the internal regulator's I/C decides to act up, who knows what the results will be, depends on how it fails. Ninety-nine percent of the time everything works as designed. Its that other one percent that we're talking about. With the internal regulator, you have no way of stopping the current from flowing into the field windings if/when the I/C malfunctions, therefore you can't shut it down. =20 So, what would happen to your electronics if this happens? I don't know the maximum voltage limit on the EC-2 or EM-2, but the alternator is capable of producing over 100 volts. I doubt the EC-2 or EM-2 can tolerate anywhere near this. (Years ago when I was working as a fleet mechanic, we tried a device that hooked up to the alternator that would allow you to run 110v tools off the vehicle's charging system. It worked, but was unreliable. But that's another story.) The specs on my SL-30 nav/com say 32v is max. So, if the alternator malfunctions and starts over-charging, you will likely start letting the smoke out of your expensive electronics. And it won't take long and things will get real quiet (after the smoke is out of the EC-2). So, this is enough reason for me to go with the external regulator and OVP. =20 My system uses two ND alternators and two RG batteries, with a crossfeed relay between the batteries. So, if one alternator self-destructs, the OVM will automatically shut it down, and turn on a warning light on the panel. At that point I would activate the x-feed relay (connecting both batteries to the remaining "good" alternator and continue on my way. I can repair/replace the alternator at my destination. =20 Mark S.