X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from sccmmhc91.asp.att.net ([204.127.203.211] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0c1) with ESMTP id 679163 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:14:08 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.203.211; envelope-from=btilley@mchsi.com Received: from [192.168.1.101] (12-214-72-178.client.mchsi.com[12.214.72.178]) by sccmmhc91.asp.att.net (sccmmhc91) with SMTP id <20050823161318m9100g7768e>; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 16:13:24 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bob Tilley Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fire extinguishers Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:13:18 -0400 To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Folks, I know of another system for a spacecraft where they are concerned of the engine having a burn thru. To get protection they wrapped the igniter wire/tape around the engine. in the event of burn thru it would melt the wire and shut down the engine. Maybe we could come up with a modified "Scaled" system to work inside our cowlings. Bob On Aug 23, 2005, at 11:31 AM, Ernest Christley wrote: > Bulent Aliev wrote: > >> I was just thinking: a sensor from a house smoke alarm positioned at >> the cooling air exit point, can give a first alert signal? Any smoke >> has to come out there. >> Buly > > They're smoke detectors, and the smoke has to reach a certain > threshold before the alarm trips. There won't necessarily be a lot of > smoke in a gas fire. Any smoke that is made will be heavily diluted > by the fresh air used for cooling. > > There was a recent thread on the Aerolectric list that discussed > detection techniques. Infra-red detectors were recommended, and > they're supposed to be fairly cheap and will feed into one of those > miniature monitors so that you can see what is happening. In my > opinion, it's more weight and complexity than it's worth. > I didn't like the first idea that was offered; run a twisted pair of > thin wire all around the engine compartment. The theory is that a > fire will burn through the insulation, shorting the wires and tripping > an alarm. My theory is that the wires would get oxidized and covered > in melted plastic before they could short, preventing a good contact > and defeating the alarm. I would modify the design to be a single > wire of the thinnest possible gauge, made from that cheap twisted > aluminum stuff instead of real copper. It would always be powered > when the engine was running, and if anything cut the wire for any > reason an alarm would go off. I'd have no idea what cut the wire, but > I'd know something was amiss, be it a fire or parts leaving the > engine. Either way the alarm would mean, "Get on the ground. NOW!!" > I'm going on the assumption that the death rate on precautionary > landings is very low. > -- > ,|"|"|, | > ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta | > o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org | > > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/ >