Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.68.10.87; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <430A44F3.4020700@nc.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:34:43 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Help, intermittent fuel leak ((Solved!!))
References: <list-678020@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-678020@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bartrim, Todd wrote:

> 
>Do you mean in my plane??? Don't you think a Dyke Delta would be a much
>better test bed?
>  
>

NO! Gracious, no.

I was thinking out in the middle of a concrete driveway, or a dirt lot.  
Away from anything valuable or flammable.

My concern would be that the powder wouldn't flow down the tube, or that 
it would all blow out the first hole or two.  I wouldn't be concerned 
much about the airflow provided stuff comes out the tube in the general 
area.  Close counts in horseshoes, hand grenades, and now fire 
extinquishers.

I think your idea is a good one.  I have an old, kitchen type 
extinquisher, that I keep with my welding equipment.  It's about time to 
replace it, so it is a prime candidate for such a test.

-- 
         ,|"|"|,                                    |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----        Dyke Delta         |
        o|  d  |o          www.ernest.isa-geek.org  |