X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail18.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.199] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTPS id 613768 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 17:09:43 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.199; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d220-236-101-218.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.236.101.218]) by mail18.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j6OL8p3j006844 for ; Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:08:54 +1000 Message-ID: <001201c59094$03d075c0$da65ecdc@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: TES "O" Rings Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 07:09:42 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C590E7.D49EF700" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C590E7.D49EF700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David, Kelly has gone one better and sent Jeff an endhousing.=20 George I cannot stand this any longer, "For Crying out loud" Why not get an = OEM Mazda O ring, send it to Creavey and get Jeff to make one the = goddamn same size! It was good enough for LeMans for 24 hrs, it will be = good enough for us. FWIW, Dave McC On 24/07/2005, at 9:29 AM, George Lendich wrote: Kelly, Maybe at this present point in time, but who knows down the track. =20 BTW one size I omitted for the inner "O" ring was the .093" which = was approx 1 : .77 - good for that size recess, I thought by just = looking at it,it would be too small ( thin), which Bill identified as = being a uneducated response. I ment to tell you, but forgot. I am also now thinking that the .093 may be too large for the outer = - however it won't see the same heat, nor expand as much as the inner. Their results will be interesting. George ( down under) George, It may be that only you and I are interested in the correct = size of the coolent O-rings and/or the need for a TES outer = O-ring........Housing is boxed and ready to ship to "Creavey" Monday ! -- Kelly Troyer=20 Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2 ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C590E7.D49EF700 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
David,
Kelly has gone one better and = sent Jeff an=20 endhousing. 
George
I=20 cannot stand this any longer, "For Crying out loud" Why not get an OEM = Mazda O=20 ring, send it to Creavey and get Jeff to make one the goddamn same = size! It=20 was good enough for LeMans for 24 hrs, it will be good enough for us. = FWIW,=20 Dave McC
On 24/07/2005, at 9:29 AM, George Lendich wrote:

Kelly,
Maybe=20 at this present point in time, but who knows down the = track.
 
BTW=20 one size I omitted for the inner "O" ring was the .093" which was = approx 1 :=20 .77 - good for that size recess, I thought by just looking at = it,it =20 would be too small ( thin), which Bill identified as being a = uneducated=20 response.
I=20 ment to tell you, but = forgot.
I=20 am also now thinking that the .093 may be too large for the outer - = however=20 it won't see the same heat, nor expand as much as the = inner.
Their=20 results will be = interesting.
George=20 ( down under)
George,
    It may be that only you = and I=20 are interested in the correct size of the
coolent O-rings = and/or the=20 need for a TES outer O-ring........Housing
is boxed and ready = to ship=20 to "Creavey" Monday !
--
Kelly Troyer
Dyke=20 = Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2




------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C590E7.D49EF700--