X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.115] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 613436 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 10:38:41 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.131.115; envelope-from=keltro@att.net Received: from 204.127.135.29 ([204.127.135.29]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with SMTP id <2005072414375211100o6dc0e>; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:37:57 +0000 Received: from [209.247.222.91] by 204.127.135.29; Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:37:50 +0000 From: keltro@att.net (Kelly Troyer) To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Mazda Factory O rings vs TES O rings Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 14:37:50 +0000 Message-Id: <072420051437.11187.42E3A7BE00045CC600002BB32160375964019D9B040A05@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Feb 14 2005) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_11187_1122215870_0" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_11187_1122215870_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Leon and all, For my part I just like the fact that the TES seals will take more heat and pressure and reportedly are reusable if undamaged.........Anything I can do economically to upgrade my 13B to extend its life for use at power levels (75 to 100 percent) it was not probably not designed for I am willing to do........After all it is our butts we are putting in these airplanes........IMHO.........That being said I do appreciate the opinions of all in the group !! -- Kelly Troyer Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2 -------------- Original message from "Leon Promet" : -------------- Hey Guys, Enough already! I'm with Dave on this TES O ring business, but I'm even MORE radical ... If the factory O rings were good enough to win Le Mans 24 Hr, it would seem that they SHOULD be good enough for our purposes. Moreover, they seem to last 20 odd years and over 500,000 km in cars that are well looked after and serviced regularly and the cooling systems kept clean. The only time I've EVER seen Factory O rings fail (since the mid '70s) is if the engine has been "cooked", (and then the rotor housings are warped), or the rotor housings have corroded (due to lack of a regular coolant changes), and in both these failure modes, the rotor housings are throw-aways anyhow. Not the O ring's fault that the engine leaks water - OIF (Operator Induced Failure). So seriously, can someone PLEASE tell me WHY you all want to use TES O rings instead of the factory ones?? Apart from price, (which seems to be an issue with some), and the fact that the big bearded guy at that "other" place says you should - so why don't you guys just ask HIM for the relevant part # - he knows EVERYTHING). Still, for the life of me, I just can't see what technical advantages there are (apart from busting the O ring grooves if you happen to get the sizing wrong). I'm afraid that it has totally escaped me. Cheers, Leon --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_11187_1122215870_0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Leon and all,
      For my part  I just like the fact that the TES seals will take more heat
and pressure and reportedly are reusable if undamaged.........Anything
I can do economically to upgrade my 13B to extend its life for use at
power levels (75 to 100 percent) it was not probably not designed for
I am willing to do........After all it is our butts we are putting in these
airplanes........IMHO.........That being said I do appreciate the opinions
of all in the group !!
--
Kelly Troyer
Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2




-------------- Original message from "Leon Promet" <leonp@pacific.net.au>: --------------

Hey Guys,
 
Enough already!  I'm with Dave on this TES O ring business,  but I'm even MORE radical ...   
 
If the factory O rings were good enough to win Le Mans 24 Hr,  it would seem that they SHOULD be good enough for our purposes.  Moreover,  they seem to last 20 odd years and over 500,000 km in cars that are well looked after and serviced regularly and the cooling systems kept clean. 
 
The only time I've EVER seen Factory O rings fail (since the mid '70s) is if the engine has been "cooked",  (and then the rotor housings are warped),  or the rotor housings have corroded (due to lack of a regular coolant changes),  and in both these failure modes,  the rotor housings are throw-aways anyhow.  Not the O ring's fault that the engine leaks water - OIF (Operator Induced Failure).
 
So seriously,  can someone PLEASE tell me WHY you all want to use TES O rings instead of the factory ones?? Apart from price,  (which seems to be an issue with some),  and the fact that the big bearded guy at that "other" place says you should - so why don't you guys just ask HIM for the relevant part # - he knows EVERYTHING).
 
Still, for the life of me,  I just can't see what technical advantages there are (apart from busting the O ring grooves if you happen to get the sizing wrong).  I'm afraid that it has totally escaped me.
 
Cheers,
 
Leon
 
--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_11187_1122215870_0--