X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from imo-m28.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.9] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 610447 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:24:01 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.9; envelope-from=WRJJRS@aol.com Received: from WRJJRS@aol.com by imo-m28.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r1.7.) id q.da.2959925a (16335) for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:23:10 -0400 (EDT) From: WRJJRS@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:23:10 EDT Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: TES "O" Rings To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1121962990" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5017 -------------------------------1121962990 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en =20 In a message dated 7/21/2005 8:26:37 AM Pacific Standard Time, =20 mark.steitle@austin.utexas.edu writes: BTW, I noticed on my Creavy receipt they follow all dimensions with =E2=80= =9CID=E2=80=9D to=20 make it clear this is an inside dimension. So, when referencing the o-ring= =20 dimensions, I would recommend we follow their nomenclature so that others=20 (new to the list) will not be misled into thinking we=E2=80=99re referring=20= to CL =20 measurements FWIW Guys,=20 In the regular engineering world o-rings are always refered to by their ID= .=20 Parker is the industry standard in the US and most of the other =20 manufacturers even use the same numbering system. The odd part is that the C= ROSS =20 SECTIONAL diameter is usually LARGER than listed, just to make it wierder.=20 Bill Jepson -------------------------------1121962990 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en
In a message dated 7/21/2005 8:26:37 AM Pacific Standard Time,=20 mark.steitle@austin.utexas.edu writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000080 size= =3D2>BTW, I noticed=20= on my=20 Creavy receipt they follow all dimensions with =E2=80=9CID=E2=80=9D to mak= e it clear this is=20 an inside dimension.  So, when referencing the o-ring dimensions, I w= ould=20 recommend we follow their nomenclature so that others (new to the list) wi= ll=20 not be misled into thinking we=E2=80=99re referring to CL=20 measurements
FWIW Guys,
 In the regular engineering world o-rings are always refered to by= =20 their ID. Parker is the industry standard in the US and most of the other=20 manufacturers even use the same numbering system. The odd part is that the C= ROSS=20 SECTIONAL diameter is usually LARGER than listed, just to make it wierder.=20
Bill Jepson
-------------------------------1121962990--