X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 610248 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:28:36 -0400 Received-SPF: softfail receiver=logan.com; client-ip=171.71.176.71; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Jul 2005 07:27:52 -0700 Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j6LERfup022621 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 07:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:27:50 -0400 Received: from [64.102.45.251] ([64.102.45.251]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:28:56 -0400 Message-ID: <42DFB0E6.4030504@nc.rr.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:27:50 -0400 From: Ernest Christley Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: single/twin light rotary References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jul 2005 14:28:56.0873 (UTC) FILETIME=[8729B990:01C58E00] david mccandless wrote: > Hi Ernest, > i researched this topic just a few weeks back; I think a Harley M/C > alternator is just right for the rotary. 25, 32, and 45 amps available > OK to 9000 rpm. I think I will mount mine on the prop flange. Check > out www.compufire.com All courtesy of Leon Promet The back of the prop flange is a good idea for mechanical attachment. The only problem I see is that the shaft RPM has already been reduced there. Ground operations will only get you something on the order of 300RPM. The Compufire unit is supposedly wired to give you more current at low speed, but putting it before the PSRU will keep you from having to stress the unit's low speed ability. My plan has been to put one on the input shaft of my PSRU. I have a 1", 10-spline shaft, which is what these units were designed to take as far as I've been able to tell from the pictures. -- ,|"|"|, | ----===<{{(oQo)}}>===---- Dyke Delta | o| d |o www.ernest.isa-geek.org |