Received-SPF: softfail
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.102.122.149; envelope-from=echristley@nc.rr.com
Message-ID: <42DFA5EC.9070007@nc.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:41:00 -0400
From: Ernest Christley <echristley@nc.rr.com>
Reply-To: echristley@nc.rr.com
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050317)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] single/twin light rotary
References: <list-610158@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-610158@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

rijakits wrote:

> Hi guys,
>  
> this posted on the other list yesterday:
>  
> http://www.rotamax.net/
>  
> IF they really come online, this would be the right engine for 
> ultralights!
>  
> Thomas J.


I think it is  a little suspicious that they claim less emissions than a 
cylinder'ed engine.

I do like the fact that they publicize a "generator coil" vs a standard 
alternator.  Maybe we can convince them to sell parts.

-- 
         ,|"|"|,                                    |
----===<{{(oQo)}}>===----        Dyke Delta         |
        o|  d  |o          www.ernest.isa-geek.org  |