X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail18.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.199] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTPS id 220779 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 18:48:01 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.199; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d211-31-217-122.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.31.217.122]) by mail18.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j6KMlASv011708 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:47:13 +1000 Message-ID: <004801c58d7d$12965e40$7ad91fd3@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: TES "O" Rings Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 08:47:56 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0045_01C58DD0.E39A4760" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0045_01C58DD0.E39A4760 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark, Thank you very much for your trouble mate, but I've found the 11.230 = just a tad too big and I'm hoping the 11.182 is that much better. However I did try the 11.230 again and it does fit when it 's pushed = into place and tends to want to press to the outer wall of the groove - = as in a spring fit - I don't know if this is a good thing or not!? Now I know where PL got the new size from, but in my opinion both the = 11.230 and the 11.182 will do the job. How come you only got the outer Creavey and not the inner as well!? Do we have any takers on sending an old Rotor housing to Creavey to = check for correct fit? George ( down under) George, I found my receipt from Creavy Seal Co. Unfortunately, it is only for = one coolant seal, and both oil seals. =20 =20 As for the outer coolant seal. Originally I ordered a set of SIL .093 = - 11.340 ID o-rings. These proved to be too big and I had to send them = back. Note that 11.340 minus .090 is 11.230. the correct size. I had = given them a size based on CL, not ID. So, be sure you're on the same = page when ordering these things. After a few emails to Jeff Chrysler, = we got it right on the re-order with these numbers. SIL .093 - 11.230. = These fit perfectly. I can find no records for what I ordered on the = inner coolant seals. Here is an email I sent to Jeff Chrysler at Creavy = Seal after fit-checking the new outer coolant o-rings. =20 Attn: Jeff Chrysler =20 Hi Jeff, The reworked TES o-rings fit perfect. Final dimension for the outer = coolant o-rings is .093 x 11.230" ID. Thank you so much for all your = help. I can start putting my engine back together now. I have passed = this information along to Paul Lamar as well. This size should work for = all 13B and 20B engines, but you may want to verify size before using it = for the new Renesis engines. =20 =20 Thanks again for your assistance, Mark Steitle =20 The information for the two oil seals are SIL .093 - 4.680 ID, and SIL = .118 - 4.330 ID. =20 Hope this helps, =20 Mark=20 =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of George Lendich Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 6:33 PM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: TES "O" Rings =20 Thank the Lord for small mercies! At least we have a consensus on that, I was thinking Oh No! not = another variation. George (down under) Kelly, On second though, I believe you're right and I was wrong. Creavy = works with ID, not CL. =20 =20 Mark =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of Kelly Troyer Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:41 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: TES "O" Rings =20 Cary, Thanks for the input.......What we are trying to do is get final = and absolute numbers on the sizes required........One of the first requirements = is for all to=20 be on the same page with measurements.......Previous reports have = shown ID's , OD's , Center diameter and/or total length........I seem to = remember reading=20 a previous post that "Creavey" preferred working with a ID = measurement but Mark just posted that the Center diameter is what they use ?? = Bottom line we all need to be on the same page among ourselves and with = "Creavey". =20 FWIW -- Kelly Troyer=20 Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2=20 =20 -------------- Original message from jbeazley : = --------------=20 > Hi Kelly;=20 >=20 > I believe Paul's numbers worked out to be:=20 >=20 > Oil O-rings=20 > 0.093 x 4.68=20 > 0.118 x 4.33=20 >=20 > coolant O-rings=20 > 0.093 x 8.932 (0.098 not available)=20 > 0.093 x 11.182=20 >=20 >=20 > I ordered the coolant orings with 9.00 and 11.25 ID, they fit = without=20 > stretching and had a bit of slack, I would get slightly smaller = next=20 > time.=20 > I should also add these were for an '86 NA. I assume they are = all=20 > supposed=20 > to be the same but I have seen some casting differences between=20 > housings.=20 >=20 > The 0.093 x 8.932 were originally listed as .098 but I was told = by=20 > Creavey=20 > this size is not available.=20 > These appear to be narrow in the wide groove but have an = approximately=20 > correct "nominal squeeze".=20 > Biggest problem seems to be getting the oring to stay in the = groove=20 > with minimal hylomar during installation.=20 >=20 > I believe the ones you want are the SIL/PFA o-rings good to = 500F.=20 > Ask for them specifically.=20 >=20 > Haven't run the engine yet to give any real feedback.=20 >=20 > Cheers=20 > Cary=20 >=20 > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 ------=_NextPart_000_0045_01C58DD0.E39A4760 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mark,
Thank you very much for your trouble = mate, but I've=20 found the 11.230 just a tad too big and I'm hoping the 11.182 is that = much=20 better.
 
However I did try the 11.230 again and = it does fit=20 when it 's pushed into place and tends to want to press to the outer = wall of the=20 groove - as in a spring fit - I don't know if this is a good thing or=20 not!?
 
Now I know where PL got the new size = from, but in=20 my opinion both the 11.230 and the 11.182 will do the job.
 
How come you only got the outer Creavey = and not the=20 inner as well!?
Do we have any takers on sending an = old Rotor=20 housing to Creavey to check for correct fit?
George ( down under)

George,

I found my = receipt=20 from Creavy Seal Co.  Unfortunately, it is only for one coolant = seal, and=20 both oil seals. 

 

As for the = outer=20 coolant seal=85 Originally I ordered a set of SIL .093 =96 11.340 ID=20 o-rings.  These proved to be too big and I had to send them = back. =20 Note that 11.340 minus .090 is 11.230=85 the correct size.  I had = given=20 them a size based on CL, not ID.  So, be sure you=92re on the = same page=20 when ordering these things.  After a few emails to Jeff Chrysler, = we got=20 it right on the re-order with these numbers=85 SIL .093 =96 11.230. These fit=20 perfectly.  I can find no records for what I ordered on the inner = coolant=20 seals.  Here is an email I sent to Jeff Chrysler at Creavy Seal = after=20 fit-checking the new outer coolant = o-rings.

 

<snip>

Attn:  Jeff = Chrysler

 

Hi Jeff,

The reworked TES o-rings fit perfect.  = Final=20 dimension for the outer coolant o-rings is .093 x 11.230" ID.  = Thank you=20 so much for all your help.  I can start putting my engine back = together=20 now.  I have passed this information along to Paul Lamar as = well. =20 This size should work for all 13B and 20B engines, but you may want to = verify=20 size before using it for the new Renesis engines. =20

 

Thanks again for your=20 assistance,

Mark Steitle

<snip>

 

The = information for=20 the two oil seals are SIL .093 =96 4.680 ID, and SIL .118 =96 4.330=20 ID.

 

Hope this=20 helps,

 

Mark=20

 


From:=20 Rotary motors in aircraft = [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On=20 Behalf Of George Lendich
Sent:
Tuesday, July 19, 2005 = 6:33=20 PM
To: = Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: TES = "O"=20 Rings

 

Thank the Lord for small = mercies!

At least we have a = consensus on=20 that, I was thinking Oh No! not another =20 variation.

George (down=20 under)

Kelly,

On second = though, I=20 believe you=92re right and I was wrong.  Creavy works with ID, = not=20 CL. 

 

Mark

 


From:=20 Rotary motors in = aircraft=20 [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On=20 Behalf Of Kelly Troyer
Sent:
Tuesday, July 19, 2005 = 10:41=20 AM
To: = Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: TES = "O"=20 Rings

 

Cary,

  Thanks for the input.......What we = are trying=20 to do is get final and absolute

numbers on the sizes required........One = of the=20 first requirements is for all to

be on the same page with = measurements.......Previous=20 reports have shown

ID's , OD's , Center diameter and/or total = length........I seem to remember reading=20

a previous post that "Creavey" preferred = working=20 with a ID measurement

but Mark just posted that the Center = diameter is=20 what they use ?? Bottom

line we all need to be on the same page = among=20 ourselves and with "Creavey".

 

FWIW

--
Kelly Troyer
Dyke = Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2

 

-------------- Original message from = jbeazley=20 <jbeazley@magma.ca>: --------------


> Hi = Kelly;=20
>
> I believe Paul's numbers worked out to be: =
>=20
> Oil O-rings
> 0.093 x 4.68
> 0.118 x 4.33 =
>=20
> coolant O-rings
> 0.093 x 8.932 (0.098 not = available)=20
> 0.093 x 11.182
>
>
> I ordered the = coolant=20 orings with 9.00 and 11.25 ID, they fit without
> = stretching and=20 had a bit of slack, I would get slightly smaller next
> = time.=20
> I should also add these were for an '86 NA. I assume they = are all=20
> supposed
> to be the same but I have seen some = casting=20 differences between
> housings.
>
> The 0.093 = x 8.932=20 were originally listed as .098 but I was told by
> Creavey =
>=20 this size is not available.
> These appear to be narrow in = the wide=20 groove but have an approximately
> correct "nominal = squeeze".=20
> Biggest problem seems to be getting the oring to stay in = the=20 groove
> with minimal hylomar during installation.
> =
> I believe the ones you want are the SIL/PFA o-rings good = to 500F.=20
> Ask for them specifically.
>
> Haven't run = the=20 engine yet to give any real feedback.
>
> Cheers =
>=20 Cary=20
>
> >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ =
>=20 >> Archive: = http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 =

------=_NextPart_000_0045_01C58DD0.E39A4760--