X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.202] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 220574 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 16:20:21 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.162.202; envelope-from=wdleonard@gmail.com Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z3so1485461nzf for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:19:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=J1AnrdNqkC9PIkoCAArciPNal2hfoU5gXJpukQpeFJEkwTWJj8lTLmnCPHQJYjUkgPBFfWFoxhcHZrr/cWsS0EPKv/8PiBrcBL+6LHVOv9eVFgZqYt53u/5VVGM7WyWdRGpPTSMZUm8isO9jDQLJUXr4SbEfXd25lz6PZJIYnHg= Received: by 10.36.57.19 with SMTP id f19mr253740nza; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.9.4 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:28:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1c23473f05072009283e290656@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:28:40 -0700 From: David Leonard Reply-To: David Leonard To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Evans Coolant In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_8537_26290813.1121876920009" References: ------=_Part_8537_26290813.1121876920009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline is: since the drive is going back to Tracy soon, should I switch to the= =20 > RD-1C or stick with the B-model?=20 > As Buly mentioned, the rotation is different, but you did want a new pro= p=20 > anyway right? The biggest problem is the thrust offset. If your current= =20 > mount offsets the prop to the left, then switching to a -C drive will be= =20 > somewhat of a problem. On the RV-3, it was a hand (and foot) full on take= off=20 > when I changed to the -C drive. Now that I shimmed the mount back to zero= =20 > offset, it's a pussycat. Of course you realize what's involved in changin= g=20 > the mount angle...=20 > Since you're determined to make the turbo work, you can get about as muc= h=20 > power as you want that way, so I'm not sure I'd bother with the new drive= .=20 > I'm still hoping that I can get a significant improvement in power with t= he=20 > new intake, so I won't have to pursue the turbo again.=20 > Cheers, > Rusty (starting to enjoy the continuous sound of chainsaws)=20 >=20 I didn't realize that shimming your mount made such a difference. I am not= =20 interested in doing that because it would require re-mounting of the cowl. = I=20 do plan on a 3-blade prop to improve smoothness, but cato has a 4-month wai= t=20 period. And you are right about power output, cooling is still likely to be= =20 my limitation in the foreseeable future and not the ability to make the=20 power. B-drive it is. Waiting for traffic to go down to drive to the old hangar to get the tools= =20 to remove the gear drive. --=20 Dave Leonard Turbo Rotary RV-6 N4VY http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html http://members.aol.com/vp4skydoc/index.html ------=_Part_8537_26290813.1121876920009 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline

 is: since the drive is going back to Tracy soon, should I switch= to the RD-1C or stick with the B-model? 
 
As Buly mentioned, the ro= tation is different, but you did want a new prop anyway right?   = The biggest problem is the thrust offset.  If your current mount = offsets the prop to the left, then switching to a -C drive will b= e somewhat of a problem.  On the RV-3, it was a hand (and foot) f= ull on takeoff when I changed to the -C drive.  Now that I shimmed the= mount back to zero offset, it's a pussycat.  Of course you = realize what's involved in changing the mount angle...  
 
Since you're determined t= o make the turbo work, you can get about as much power as you want that way= , so I'm not sure I'd bother with the new drive.  I'm still hopin= g that I can get a significant improvement in power with the new intake, so= I won't have to pursue the turbo again.  
 
Cheers,
Rusty (starting to enjoy = the continuous sound of chainsaws) 

I didn't realize that shimming your mount made such a difference.&= nbsp; I am not interested in doing that because it would require re-mountin= g of the cowl.  I do plan on a 3-blade prop to improve smoothness, but= cato has a 4-month wait period.  And you are right about power output= , cooling is still likely to be my limitation in the foreseeable future&nbs= p;and not the ability to make the power.  B-drive it is.
 
Waiting for traffic to go down to drive to the old hangar to get the t= ools to remove the gear drive.

--
Dave Leonard
Turbo Rotary R= V-6 N4VY
http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/rotaryroster/index.html
http://members.aol.com/vp4skydoc/i= ndex.html
------=_Part_8537_26290813.1121876920009--