X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [129.116.87.142] (HELO MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 220160 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:25:45 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=129.116.87.142; envelope-from=mark.steitle@austin.utexas.edu X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C58D2E.6DCAA892" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Re: TES "O" Rings Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:24:59 -0500 Message-ID: <87DBA06C9A5CB84B80439BA09D86E69E016C1B90@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [FlyRotary] Re: TES "O" Rings Thread-Index: AcWNLXxbZDYcn0hTTRSsUeQRp7EvXAAAGMjg From: "Mark R Steitle" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C58D2E.6DCAA892 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Well, that's what I get for trying to do the math in my head early in the morning... before having my first cup of coffee. The point is that they fit perfectly. Based on PL's experience using o-rings that were about .040 smaller, I don't think that .010 - .020 is going to hurt anything (probably within mfg. tolerances). =20 Mark =20 =20 ________________________________ From: Rotary motors in aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Finn Lassen Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:18 AM To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: TES "O" Rings =20 Is this some kind of special American arithmetic? Finn Mark R Steitle wrote: and I had to send them back. Note that 11.340 minus .090 is 11.230...=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C58D2E.6DCAA892 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Well, that’s what I get for = trying to do the math in my head early in the morning… before having my = first cup of coffee. The point is that they fit perfectly. Based = on PL’s experience using o-rings that were about .040 smaller, I don’t = think that .010 - .020 is going to hurt anything (probably within mfg. = tolerances).

Mark

From: Rotary motors in = aircraft [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Finn Lassen
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, = 2005 8:18 AM
To: Rotary motors in aircraft
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = TES "O" Rings

Is this some kind of special American = arithmetic?

Finn

Mark R Steitle wrote:

&= nbsp;and I had to send them back. Note that 11.340 minus .090 is = 11.230…

------_=_NextPart_001_01C58D2E.6DCAA892--