X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail25.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.133.166] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTPS id 180982 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:26:50 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.133.166; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d220-236-108-201.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.236.108.201]) by mail25.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j6JNPxl6028370 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:26:01 +1000 Message-ID: <002d01c58cb9$540b1ce0$c96cecdc@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: TES "O" Rings Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:26:44 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Gary/Kelly, Your figures seem more accurate given mine are too big. The Oil rings are the same size I have now recorded. The Inner coolant ring of 8.932 ID is indeed smaller than the 9.111 ID. The Outer 11.182 is also smaller than my recorded 11.230 ID ( which is down from Paul's original figure of 11.340") - I figure that yours must be right. Gary, are your "O" rings red in the middle with a clear outer covering!? It's just that it looks different to what I've seen in photo's. Do Creavy take back and exchange? George (down under) > Hi Kelly; > > I believe Paul's numbers worked out to be: > > Oil O-rings > 0.093 x 4.68 > 0.118 x 4.33 > > coolant O-rings > 0.093 x 8.932 (0.098 not available) > 0.093 x 11.182 > > > I ordered the coolant orings with 9.00 and 11.25 ID, they fit without > stretching and had a bit of slack, I would get slightly smaller next > time. > I should also add these were for an '86 NA. I assume they are all > supposed > to be the same but I have seen some casting differences between > housings. > > The 0.093 x 8.932 were originally listed as .098 but I was told by > Creavey > this size is not available. > These appear to be narrow in the wide groove but have an approximately > correct "nominal squeeze". > Biggest problem seems to be getting the oring to stay in the groove > with minimal hylomar during installation. > > I believe the ones you want are the SIL/PFA o-rings good to 500F. > Ask for them specifically. > > Haven't run the engine yet to give any real feedback. > > Cheers > Cary > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html >