X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.115] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTP id 180010 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:17:27 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.131.115; envelope-from=keltro@att.net Received: from 204.127.135.42 ([204.127.135.42]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with SMTP id <2005071904164211100o79uve>; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 04:16:42 +0000 Received: from [209.247.222.95] by 204.127.135.42; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 04:16:40 +0000 From: keltro@att.net (Kelly Troyer) To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: TES "O" Rings Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 04:16:40 +0000 Message-Id: <071920050416.6759.42DC7EA8000448F700001A672160281302019D9B040A05@att.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Feb 14 2005) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_6759_1121746600_0" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_6759_1121746600_0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit George, I am trying to dig up the last numbers that were claimed to be valid !! -- Kelly Troyer Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2 -------------- Original message from "George Lendich" : -------------- Kelly, I'm going by the list of sizes provided (by the other list) which have been amended a few times - it's hard to keep track. Creavy also provided measurements which are wrong!! OK I ordered for the outer coolant "O" ring, .093 cross section ( perfect) 11.230" ID ( which is smaller than the original measurement of 11.340")this still just a tad big in diameter. I asked Creavey to give me an indication of the size under that diameter. A size under, may in fact, be too small - will have to wait and see. I also ordered for the inner coolant "O" ring, .093 ( they should have been .098, I discovered in earlier e-mails) and yes, they were a bit sloppy in the groove, .098 would have been much better. The diameter I have recorded here (and which I ordered) is 9.111" ID - way too big! How does that compare to your information. I'm in the process of checking ( as best I can) the diameters from the housings. I will also provide photos of the "O" rings in a new housing. If we can get the right sizes they are an extremely good "O" ring. I have checked the cross section of the oil "O" rings which are .118 x 4.330" and .093 x 4.680"- but have not checked the diameter of either. I figure if we can get a housing and some standard "O" rings to Creavey, we stand a better chance of getting they exactly right as they would have physical things to check against - should have thought of this sooner - but I was trusting you guys over there to have got it right by now. George ( down under) George, All the O-rings (oil seal and side housing) or just the side housing ?? Can you give us the I.D. and cross section of the inner and outer coolent O-rings that you received.......I know that some on this list have received and are using the correct 0-rings !! -- Kelly Troyer Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2 -------------- Original message from "George Lendich" : -------------- OK! I just got my TES "O" rings - they look beautiful, but don't fit - bugger!! So the sizes provided by everyone are incorrect. Creavey Seal Coy. is in Olyphant PA is anyone near there that can drop them an old damaged housing, so they can trial fit the correct size "O' rings. George ( down under) --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_6759_1121746600_0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
George,
   I am trying to dig up the last numbers that were claimed to be valid !!
--
Kelly Troyer
Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2




-------------- Original message from "George Lendich" <lendich@optusnet.com.au>: --------------

Kelly,
I'm going by the list of sizes provided (by the other list) which have been amended a few times - it's hard to keep track. Creavy also provided measurements which are wrong!!
 
OK I ordered for the outer coolant "O" ring, .093 cross section ( perfect)
11.230" ID ( which is smaller than the original measurement of 11.340")this still just a tad big in diameter. I asked Creavey to give me an indication of the size under that diameter. A size under, may in fact, be too small - will have to wait and see.
 
I also ordered for the inner coolant "O" ring, .093 ( they should have been .098, I discovered in earlier e-mails) and yes, they were a bit sloppy in the groove, .098 would have been much better. The diameter I have recorded here (and which I ordered) is 9.111" ID - way too big!
 
How does that compare to your information.
I'm in the process of checking ( as best I can) the diameters from the housings.
 
I will also provide photos of the "O" rings in a new housing. If we can get the right sizes they are an extremely good "O" ring.
 
I have checked the cross section of the oil "O" rings which are .118 x 4.330" and .093 x 4.680"- but have not checked the diameter of either.
 
I figure if we can get a housing and some standard "O" rings to Creavey, we stand a better chance of getting they exactly right as they would have physical things to check against - should have thought of this sooner - but I was trusting you guys over there to have got it right by now.
 
George ( down under)

George,
   All the O-rings (oil seal and side housing) or just the side housing ?? Can you
give us the I.D. and cross section of the inner and outer coolent O-rings that
you received.......I know that some on this list have received and are using the
correct 0-rings !!
--
Kelly Troyer
Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2




-------------- Original message from "George Lendich" <lendich@optusnet.com.au>: --------------

OK! I just got my TES "O" rings - they look beautiful, but don't fit - bugger!!
So the sizes provided by everyone are incorrect.
 
Creavey Seal Coy. is in Olyphant PA
is anyone near there that can drop them an old damaged housing, so they can trial fit the correct size "O' rings.
 
George ( down under)
--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_6759_1121746600_0--