X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-PolluStop: No license found, only first 5 messages were scanned Return-Path: Received: from mail10.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.191] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.6) with ESMTPS id 1060334 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 18 Jul 2005 22:45:54 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.132.191; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d211-31-217-122.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.31.217.122]) by mail10.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j6J2j2UF002239 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:45:04 +1000 Message-ID: <000d01c58c0b$f754b5e0$7ad91fd3@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: TES "O" Rings Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:45:45 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C58C5F.C83EAE60" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C58C5F.C83EAE60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kelly, I'm going by the list of sizes provided (by the other list) which have = been amended a few times - it's hard to keep track. Creavy also provided = measurements which are wrong!! OK I ordered for the outer coolant "O" ring, .093 cross section ( = perfect) 11.230" ID ( which is smaller than the original measurement of = 11.340")this still just a tad big in diameter. I asked Creavey to give = me an indication of the size under that diameter. A size under, may in = fact, be too small - will have to wait and see. I also ordered for the inner coolant "O" ring, .093 ( they should have = been .098, I discovered in earlier e-mails) and yes, they were a bit = sloppy in the groove, .098 would have been much better. The diameter I = have recorded here (and which I ordered) is 9.111" ID - way too big! How does that compare to your information. I'm in the process of checking ( as best I can) the diameters from the = housings. I will also provide photos of the "O" rings in a new housing. If we can = get the right sizes they are an extremely good "O" ring. I have checked the cross section of the oil "O" rings which are .118 x = 4.330" and .093 x 4.680"- but have not checked the diameter of either. I figure if we can get a housing and some standard "O" rings to Creavey, = we stand a better chance of getting they exactly right as they would = have physical things to check against - should have thought of this = sooner - but I was trusting you guys over there to have got it right by = now. George ( down under) George, All the O-rings (oil seal and side housing) or just the side = housing ?? Can you give us the I.D. and cross section of the inner and outer coolent = O-rings that you received.......I know that some on this list have received and are = using the correct 0-rings !! -- Kelly Troyer=20 Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2=20 -------------- Original message from "George Lendich" = : --------------=20 OK! I just got my TES "O" rings - they look beautiful, but don't fit = - bugger!! So the sizes provided by everyone are incorrect. Creavey Seal Coy. is in Olyphant PA is anyone near there that can drop them an old damaged housing, so = they can trial fit the correct size "O' rings. George ( down under) ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C58C5F.C83EAE60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Kelly,
I'm going by the list of sizes provided = (by the=20 other list) which have been amended a few times - it's hard to keep = track.=20 Creavy also provided measurements which are wrong!!
 
OK I ordered for the outer coolant "O" = ring, .093=20 cross section ( perfect)
11.230" ID ( which is smaller than = the=20 original measurement of 11.340")this still just a tad big in diameter. I = asked=20 Creavey to give me an indication of the size under that diameter. A size = under,=20 may in fact, be too small - will have to wait and see.
 
I also ordered for the inner = coolant "O"=20 ring, .093 ( they should have been .098, I discovered in earlier = e-mails) and=20 yes, they were a bit sloppy in the groove, .098 would have been much = better. The=20 diameter I have recorded here (and which I ordered) is 9.111" ID - = way too=20 big!
 
How does that compare to your=20 information.
I'm in the process of checking ( as = best I can) the=20 diameters from the housings.
 
I will also provide photos of the "O" = rings in a=20 new housing. If we can get the right sizes they are an extremely good = "O"=20 ring.
 
I have checked the cross section of the = oil "O"=20 rings which are .118 x 4.330" and .093 x 4.680"- but have not = checked=20 the diameter of either.
 
I figure if we can get a housing = and some=20 standard "O" rings to Creavey, we stand a better chance of getting they = exactly=20 right as they would have physical things to check against - = should=20 have thought of this sooner - but I was trusting you guys over there to = have got=20 it right by now.
 
George ( down under)

George,
   All the O-rings (oil seal and side housing) or just = the side=20 housing ?? Can you
give us the I.D. and cross section of the inner and outer coolent = O-rings=20 that
you received.......I know that some on this list have received = and are=20 using the
correct 0-rings !!
--
Kelly Troyer
Dyke=20 Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2




--------------=20 Original message from "George Lendich" = <lendich@optusnet.com.au>:=20 --------------

OK! I just got my TES "O" rings - = they look=20 beautiful, but don't fit - bugger!!
So the sizes provided by = everyone are=20 incorrect.
 
Creavey Seal Coy. is in Olyphant=20 PA
is anyone near there that can drop = them an old=20 damaged housing, so they can trial fit the correct size "O'=20 rings.
 
George ( down=20 under)
------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C58C5F.C83EAE60--