Sent: Wednesday, December 24, 2003 12:18 AM Subject: Vam instalation Bill, He sure hacked the thing up. I didn't have a chance to tell Ed = to make the center pipe a bit longer. Someone like Bernie Kerr with his = rad mounted cool side it would work fine. In fact I think a pusher would = have been a bad install except for the tail pipe. I intend to run two = radiators in the cheeks of the cowling and do the VAM concept folded = under the engine. Or possibly the newer inside-out concept. Bill Jepson ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C57E0D.7ECFA820 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

True, his exit pipe was restrictive, however he measured the flow = into the=20 inner tube with a pitot tube, and at higher throttle settings he found = 45 mph=20 inlet flow. At idle/taxi speeds the flow came out the other way.

Bill Schertz
KIS Cruiser # 4045

----- Original Message -----
From:=20 WRJJRS@aol.com
To: Rotary motors in = aircraft

Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 = 11:27=20 PM

Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fw: = Vam=20 instalation

In a message dated 6/30/2005 8:03:34 PM Pacific Standard Time, wschertz@ispwest.com = writes:
Here=20 is an old email where Jerry Bass tried the VAM
Bill = Schertz
KIS=20 Cruiser # 4045
----- Original Message -----
From: "ACRE" = <rotaryeng@earthlink.net>Sent:=20 Wednesday, December 24, 2003 12:18 AM
Subject: Vam=20 instalation

Bill, He sure hacked the thing up. I didn't have a chance to tell = Ed to=20 make the center pipe a bit longer. Someone like Bernie Kerr with his = rad=20 mounted cool side it would work fine. In fact I think a pusher would = have been=20 a bad install except for the tail pipe. I intend to run two radiators = in the=20 cheeks of the cowling and do the VAM concept folded under the engine. = Or=20 possibly the newer inside-out concept.

Bill Jepson

------=_NextPart_000_002E_01C57E0D.7ECFA820--