X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from mail22.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.133.160] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.5) with ESMTPS id 1027864 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 18:26:46 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=211.29.133.160; envelope-from=lendich@optusnet.com.au Received: from george (d211-31-107-82.dsl.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.31.107.82]) by mail22.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id j5UMPxTO001997 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2005 08:25:59 +1000 Message-ID: <010801c57dc2$ba7e6460$526b1fd3@george> From: "George Lendich" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: P Ports working on dyno Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 08:26:15 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0105_01C57E16.8BDF88B0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0105_01C57E16.8BDF88B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bill, I think I may even like that one better ! George ( down under) Bill, do you think the misunderstanding of the design was more = widespread. I think PL did not grasp it either. My recollection back = then did not include the center pipe but I could easily be wrong. I = wrote Ed for clarification. More importantly, I like the design and if = my system proves inadequate, I will build a version of yours. Seems like = the outlet opening around the tube where it enters the tailpipe might be = restrictive. Jerry=20 Jerry, The size of the annullus is deceptive, you can size it to be = very low restriction. I finished the layout of the backward or inside = out version. Check out the jpeg. Bill Jepson -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html ------=_NextPart_000_0105_01C57E16.8BDF88B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bill,

I think I may even like that one better = !

George ( down under)

Bill, do you think the misunderstanding of the design was more=20 widespread. I think PL did not grasp it either. My recollection back = then did=20 not include the center pipe but I could easily be wrong. I wrote Ed = for=20 clarification. More importantly, I like the design and if my system = proves=20 inadequate, I will build a version of yours. Seems like the outlet = opening=20 around the tube where it enters the tailpipe might be restrictive.=20 Jerry

Jerry, The size of the annullus is deceptive, you can size it to = be very=20 low restriction. I finished the layout of the backward or inside out = version.=20 Check out the jpeg.

Bill Jepson

>> Homepage: =20 http://www.flyrotary.com/
>> Archive: =20 = http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
------=_NextPart_000_0105_01C57E16.8BDF88B0--