X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <jerryhey@earthlink.net>
Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.68] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.5)
  with ESMTP id 1027381 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:10:03 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.68; envelope-from=jerryhey@earthlink.net
Received: from [71.2.107.92] (helo=earthlink.net)
	by smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Do3TS-0002qO-4d
	for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:09:18 -0400
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple;
  s=test1; d=earthlink.net;
  h=Date:Subject:Content-Type:Mime-Version:From:To:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:X-Mailer;
  b=MXsrqV1TjDhzTbTdV/3imyA36EWfFBLhKyBPpjJPRlpXtnDVPb5XS2c787u/Y5bK;
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:11:33 -0500
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: P Ports working on dyno
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-6-113972468
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v552)
From: Jerry Hey <jerryhey@earthlink.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-1027369@logan.com>
Message-Id: <63B8E9B8-E992-11D9-91E7-0003931B0C7A@earthlink.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.552)
X-ELNK-Trace: 8104856d7830ec6b1aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79e79a12c7d210e9aa6886ff08d8379679350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 71.2.107.92


--Apple-Mail-6-113972468
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=ISO-8859-1;
	format=flowed


On Thursday, June 30, 2005, at 12:57 PM, Russell Duffy wrote:

> Bill, the muffler is "optically dense." The "tailpipe" cannot be seen=20=

> by the exhaust ports. I wish Paul had tested a little more and given=20=

> me more information. A number of people want this muffler but I have=20=

> declined to build more until it could be tested properly. Even Paul is=20=

> telling Bob White to change nothing until he hears it for himself. I=20=

> need to finish my engine and put it on my own dyno. Jerry=A0
> =A0
> Hi Jerry,
> =A0
> I've been trying=A0to follow this, but I think you guys must be=20
> referring to a post on the PL list.=A0 Did he just bolt it on and =
listen=20
> to it, then take it off without actually doing a dyno pull on it?=A0=20=

> That would be a bummer.=A0
> =A0
> If you're going to discuss it here, could you post=A0the whole message=20=

> you're=A0commenting on, so the rest of us can follow=A0along?=A0 Of =
course,=20
> you could also hold this discussion on the other list, or=A0at least=20=

> "try" to :-)=A0=A0
> =A0
> Cheers,
> Rusty

Rusty, Paul Lamar tested the muffler and said it was loud (123 DB) but=20=

qualified that by saying he was standing right next to the engine in a=20=

metal building.  He reported that others standing nearby found the=20
sound to be mellow when compared to full race open exhaust systems. =20
Not much good information to go on.  The test was done at 6000 rpm but=20=

hp was not measured so we don't know how the exhaust affects=20
performance.  I was hoping for more and that led to my statement above=20=

about needing to get my engine running and on my own dyno.   Jerry
> =A0
> =A0
> =A0

--Apple-Mail-6-113972468
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/enriched;
	charset=ISO-8859-1



On Thursday, June 30, 2005, at 12:57 PM, Russell Duffy wrote:


<excerpt>Bill, the muffler is "optically dense." The "tailpipe" cannot
be seen by the exhaust ports. I wish Paul had tested a little more and
given me more information. A number of people want this muffler but I
have declined to build more until it could be tested properly. Even
Paul is telling Bob White to change nothing until he hears it for
himself. I need to finish my engine and put it on my own dyno.
=
Jerry<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>FFFF,0000,0000</param>=A0=
</color></fontfamily>

=A0

<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>FFFF,0000,0000</param>Hi
Jerry,</color></fontfamily>

=A0

<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>FFFF,0000,0000</param>I've
been trying=A0to follow this, but I think you guys must be referring to
a post on the PL list.=A0 Did he just bolt it on and listen to it, then
take it off without actually doing a dyno pull on it?=A0 That would be a
bummer.=A0</color></fontfamily>

=A0

<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>FFFF,0000,0000</param>If
you're going to discuss it here, could you post=A0the whole message
you're=A0commenting on, so the rest of us can follow=A0along?=A0 Of =
course,
you could also hold this discussion on the other list, or=A0at least
"try" to :-)=A0=A0</color></fontfamily>

=A0

=
<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>FFFF,0000,0000</param>Cheers=
,</color></fontfamily>

=
<fontfamily><param>Arial</param><color><param>FFFF,0000,0000</param>Rusty<=
/color></fontfamily>

</excerpt>

Rusty, Paul Lamar tested the muffler and said it was loud (123 DB) but
qualified that by saying he was standing right next to the engine in a
metal building.  He reported that others standing nearby found the
sound to be mellow when compared to full race open exhaust systems.=20
Not much good information to go on.  The test was done at 6000 rpm but
hp was not measured so we don't know how the exhaust affects
performance.  I was hoping for more and that led to my statement above
about needing to get my engine running and on my own dyno.   Jerry=20

<excerpt>=A0

=A0

=A0

</excerpt>=

--Apple-Mail-6-113972468--