X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.101] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.5) with ESMTP id 1027273 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:50:02 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.101; envelope-from=eanderson@carolina.rr.com Received: from edward2 (cpe-065-188-083-049.carolina.res.rr.com [65.188.83.49]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j5UGnEl9003524 for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:49:15 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001a01c57d93$afce3b00$2402a8c0@edward2> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Stainless Steel 13B Exhaust Flange? Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 12:49:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0017_01C57D72.288CFF80" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C57D72.288CFF80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A couple of things come to mind, Georges 1. I'll only need one stainless steel muffler instead of two, so = reducing weight and $$ 2. I will clear up some of the under the cowl plumbing. Now have two = pipes I have to route each side of the nose gear. 3. Might be able to have the pipes merge at the right length so that I = can get a bit of scavenging So those are the primary things I can think of. But, weight and $$ were = the primary considerations Ed ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Echo Lake Fishing Resort (Georges Boucher)=20 To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 11:38 AM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Stainless Steel 13B Exhaust Flange? Ed=20 What is the advantage of your redesign (2 into 1)? Georges B. -------Original Message------- From: Rotary motors in aircraft Date: 06/30/05 07:15:51 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: [FlyRotary] Stainless Steel 13B Exhaust Flange? looking to re-do my two hole exhaust system into a single tube. = Am looking for a source of 13B exhaust flange stainless steel. I am = aware that Mazdatrix has a Racing Beat Flange - however, I do not = believe it is Stainless steel. Anybody have a source? Thanks Ed Ed Anderson Rv-6A N494BW Rotary Powered Matthews, NC eanderson@carolina.rr.com =20 =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C57D72.288CFF80 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A couple of things come to mind, Georges
 
1.  I'll only need one stainless steel muffler instead of two, = so=20 reducing weight and $$
2. I will clear up some of the under the cowl plumbing.  Now = have two=20 pipes I have to route each side of the nose gear.
3. Might be able to have the pipes merge at the right length = so that I=20 can get a bit of scavenging
 
So those are the primary things I can think of.  But, weight = and $$=20 were the primary considerations
 
Ed
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Echo=20 Lake Fishing Resort (Georges Boucher)
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 = 11:38=20 AM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: = Stainless Steel=20 13B Exhaust Flange?

 Ed
What is the advantage of your redesign (2 into 1)?
Georges B.
 
 
-------Original=20 Message-------
 
From: Rotary motors in=20 aircraft
Date: = 06/30/05=20 07:15:51
To: Rotary motors in=20 aircraft
Subject: = [FlyRotary]=20 Stainless Steel 13B Exhaust Flange?
 
looking to re-do my two hole exhaust = system into a=20 single tube.  Am looking for a source of 13B exhaust flange = stainless steel.  I am aware that Mazdatrix has a Racing = Beat=20 Flange - however, I do not believe it is Stainless steel.  = Anybody=20 have a source?
 
Thanks
 
Ed
Ed Anderson
Rv-6A N494BW Rotary=20 Powered
Matthews, NC
eanderson@carolina.rr.com
 
------=_NextPart_000_0017_01C57D72.288CFF80--