|
|
In a message dated 6/30/2005 4:53:28 AM Pacific Standard Time,
jerryhey@earthlink.net writes:
Bill,
the muffler did have the long tailpipe. I am disappointed by the
test. Was it too loud or not? In testing Chuck Dunlop's
plane outdoors, Paul stood about 20 feet away with the sound meter.
Also, why not make a power run when we had the chance? I was
looking for info that would with the
design.........Jerry
Jerry,
123 db is loud. If that is at 2 feet then it may be tolerable.
One thing I was going to mention was that we should be trying to make the
muffler at least optically dense. By that I mean that the exit hole needs to be
unable to "see" the inlet pipes. One of the basic tennets has always been to
make the shock wave reflect at least once on the way to the exit. The swirl
effect of the tangential muffler does help, but if the cannister is full of
exhaust gas the bark of the rotaries initial shock wave is an even wavefront
dipersing from the tubes entry into the can. If the shock wave runs directly
across the canister there will be a loud exit bark. The design could probably be
made slightly quieter by enlarging the diameter of the cool tube to pervent a
straighline path from the inlet tube to the exit.
Bill Jepson
|
|