Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #24695
From: al p wick <alwick@juno.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: NPG + use in aircraft??
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:55:41 -0700
To: <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Egg had significant cooling issues. Pretty marginal. So he went with the less efficient npg to reduce flight risk. Good decision, except they never put any effort into improving cooling. Only recently did they discover that all their radiators were restricting flow too much. Now are replacing them with much better results.
They also made progress by adding fins to improve air flow into the cores.
 
For unproven cooling install I think npg is good conservative decision. Just because it greatly reduces risk of boil over. I would never consider it for my install, as I have robust cooling. FWIW
 
-al wick
Artificial intelligence in cockpit, Cozy IV powered by stock Subaru 2.5
N9032U 200+ hours on engine/airframe from Portland, Oregon
Prop construct, Subaru install, Risk assessment, Glass panel design info:
http://www.maddyhome.com/canardpages/pages/alwick/index.html
 
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 11:28:08 -0500 "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> writes:
Can anyone confirm whether Eggenfellner recommends NPG?  I know that some of his customers run it, but I can't tell whether it's factory recommended or not.  Just curious.
 
Rusty
 
 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster